calculus help
aw man ok fine, but it makes no difference anymore
btw, why can't we delete our own threads anymore? *shrug*
f(x) = 2x + lnx
find g'(2)
FYI:
inverse function
g'(x) = 1/f'(g(x))
note to anyone that may have forgotten
g(x) is NOT the reciprocol of f(x), g(x) is obtained when you switch the x and the y and solve for y...
i tried that method and couldn't get it, i can't get g(x).
btw, why can't we delete our own threads anymore? *shrug*
f(x) = 2x + lnx
find g'(2)
FYI:
inverse function
g'(x) = 1/f'(g(x))
note to anyone that may have forgotten
g(x) is NOT the reciprocol of f(x), g(x) is obtained when you switch the x and the y and solve for y...
i tried that method and couldn't get it, i can't get g(x).
Trending Topics
If I understand you, g(x) is the inverse of f(x): f(g(x)) = g(f(x)) = x.
In that case, if y = f(x), so x = g(y), then g'(y) = 1 / f'(x). If you think of slopes and exchange the roles of x and y this reciprocal relationship is pretty clear: if y changes by 2 when x changes by 1 then dy/dx = 2, and dx/dy = 1/2.
Therefore, if x = g(2) then 2 = f(x); solve this for x, getting x = 1.
f'(x) = 2 + 1 / x, so f'(1) = 2 + 1 / 1 = 3.
g'(2) = 1 / f'(1) = 1/3.
Voila!
(Note that this can be done without an explicit formula for g(x).)
In that case, if y = f(x), so x = g(y), then g'(y) = 1 / f'(x). If you think of slopes and exchange the roles of x and y this reciprocal relationship is pretty clear: if y changes by 2 when x changes by 1 then dy/dx = 2, and dx/dy = 1/2.
Therefore, if x = g(2) then 2 = f(x); solve this for x, getting x = 1.
f'(x) = 2 + 1 / x, so f'(1) = 2 + 1 / 1 = 3.
g'(2) = 1 / f'(1) = 1/3.
Voila!
(Note that this can be done without an explicit formula for g(x).)
[QUOTE]Originally posted by magician
[B]If I understand you, g(x) is the inverse of f(x): f(g(x)) = g(f(x)) = x.
In that case, if y = f(x), so x = g(y), then g'(y) = 1 / f'(x).
[B]If I understand you, g(x) is the inverse of f(x): f(g(x)) = g(f(x)) = x.
In that case, if y = f(x), so x = g(y), then g'(y) = 1 / f'(x).


