Calculus problem help
first do a cross multipication to yield:
A = 28 + 70/h + 3h + 7.5
solve for dA/dh and set equal to 0
-70/h^2 + 3 = 0
3 = 70/h^2
3h^2 = 70
h^2 = 70/3 = 23.3333
h = sqrt of 23.3333 which is 4.830459
w = 28/h
w = 28/4.830459 = 5.796551
I hope I did it right as I have not done this in 10 years. I have an econ degree and did optimizations all the time.
A = 28 + 70/h + 3h + 7.5
solve for dA/dh and set equal to 0
-70/h^2 + 3 = 0
3 = 70/h^2
3h^2 = 70
h^2 = 70/3 = 23.3333
h = sqrt of 23.3333 which is 4.830459
w = 28/h
w = 28/4.830459 = 5.796551
I hope I did it right as I have not done this in 10 years. I have an econ degree and did optimizations all the time.
Originally Posted by magician,Mar 30 2007, 08:55 PM
Approximations! Yuck!
What's the real answer?
What's the real answer?
Originally Posted by steven975,Mar 30 2007, 08:57 PM
first do a cross multipication to yield:
28 + 70/h + 3h + 7.5
solve for dA/dh and set equal to 0
-70/h^2 + 3 = 0
3 = 70/h^2
3h^2 = 70
h^2 = 70/3 = 23.3333
h = sqrt of 23.3333 which is 4.83
w = 28/h
w = 28/4.83 = 5.80
28 + 70/h + 3h + 7.5
solve for dA/dh and set equal to 0
-70/h^2 + 3 = 0
3 = 70/h^2
3h^2 = 70
h^2 = 70/3 = 23.3333
h = sqrt of 23.3333 which is 4.83
w = 28/h
w = 28/4.83 = 5.80
w=sqrt(168/5)
No approximations.
Originally Posted by magician,Mar 30 2007, 09:09 PM
h = sqrt(70/3)
w=sqrt(168/5)
No approximations.
w=sqrt(168/5)
No approximations.
Originally Posted by AlX Boi,Mar 30 2007, 10:26 PM
Is that what you require your fullerton math students to do?
Originally Posted by AlX Boi,Mar 30 2007, 10:26 PM
We left the answer to what you had in my calc classes because calculators were generally not allowed.
Originally Posted by dongkeykong,Mar 30 2007, 10:50 PM
calculus! 
except for the derivative part (dA/dh) which was actually pretty elementary calculus.
Believe it or not this stuff has use. Say you run a factory and know how much it costs to make something, but want to make the most money possible. This is how you do it. I did this stuff in my economics coursework all the time.
Or, to a more car-related topic...
You see horsepower charts all the time. Of course you know how much peak power a car makes, but how do you know which of two horsepower curves is better? One is peaky, with a higher peak, and one is meaty with a lower peak. How do you know what is better? Well, you could do a partial integral of the relevant RPM range to find the "area under the line", which is in simpler terms the cumulative energy produced within that RPM range.
holy sh!t! did you just say partial integral? wtf is that? j/k man. that term just vaguely reminded me of the time when i took advanced calculus back in college. all i remember from that class was that i had a french professor, 3 other classmates, and 4 questions on hour and half long exam. partial credit was my friend.




