Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Can a guy get a better workout on a Stepmill

Old Jan 29, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #11  
ThatPreludeGuy's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 1
From: Northern NJ
Default

I would asusme it makes a difference, you have to lift that weight, and whats wrong with the comparison about walking up and down stairs?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 06:11 PM
  #12  
r_duff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,840
Likes: 1
From: socal
Default

u dont physically move up a stepmill. like when u put the incline up on a treadmill, are you magically going uphill? no, you're not. you center of gravity stays in the exact same spot in space, just like the weights this guy is carrying.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #13  
ThatPreludeGuy's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 1
From: Northern NJ
Default

If you were just moving your legs up and down you'd never get your heart rate up to where you do on a stair climber. You're physically lifting your bodyweight with each step, increase that weight and you increase your resistance...to gravity. I think its pretty clear cut, do it yourself tomorrow and see if its as easy as you think.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 06:10 AM
  #14  
vtec9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by r_duff,Jan 29 2008, 09:40 PM
ok you're either dumb or have no idea what a stepmill is.
I know exactly what a ****ing step mill is..

If you were just moving your legs up and down you'd never get your heart rate up to where you do on a stair climber. You're physically lifting your bodyweight with each step, increase that weight and you increase your resistance...to gravity. I think its pretty clear cut, do it yourself tomorrow and see if its as easy as you think.
listen to that guy.. if you supported your whole weight with the bottom leg, it would be the same thing as just lifting your knees up while standing in place. that's not what happens genius.. you'd fall off the stepmill like that fat chick on the treadmill.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #15  
S2020's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

of course it's more work.
Standing still takes more work when you carry a weight. if you don't believe me, try putting 200lbs on your back for 5 minutes while standing still and compare that to standing around for 5 minutes.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 10:23 AM
  #16  
S2020's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

[QUOTE=r_duff,Jan 29 2008, 07:11 PM] u dont physically move up a stepmill.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #17  
GT_2003's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=SheDrivesIt,Jan 29 2008, 04:53 PM] If the weight does not rise, he is doing no additional work.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 07:11 AM
  #18  
SheDrivesIt's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,061
Likes: 324
From: Land of Cincinnati Chili
Default

Originally Posted by GT_2003,Jan 30 2008, 06:25 PM
simple physics my ass See S2020's post above.

As long as the weight in the pack stays off the ground, he's doing more work just by carrying it. He's using muscles just holding his body erect while stepping, and given the additional weight, he's exercising more than just his legs. Now that's simple physics - energy expended over time.

This idea that "work" is only a measure of movement is a very simplistic concept only vaguely resembling physics.

Holding the weight on your back is giving a wide variety of muscles in the back and torso a workout.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #19  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by S2020,Jan 30 2008, 07:18 PM
of course it's more work.
Standing still takes more work when you carry a weight. if you don't believe me, try putting 200lbs on your back for 5 minutes while standing still and compare that to standing around for 5 minutes.
Thanks. I was going to chime in, but you took care of it.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #20  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

Also, work is technically defined by how far you've moved the mass; so, in that sense, he is doing no more work...even if he's moved it up and down 6" over and over for an hour.

The OP didn't use the word work in his post. He said "Adding weight to yourself does nothing except put extra stress on your straight leg.", which isn't true because your leg's not straight if you're on a stepmill...and, as mentioned above, you will MOST CERTAINLY get a better workout with the added weight.
Reply


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:22 AM.