Employee gets fired over racist woman
I remember reading that the USPS worker was fired for performance reasons and not for this issue. He is trying to present it in a manner saying that he got fired for this issue.
Cant seem to remember what site I read that on, Gawker maybe 
EDIT: Found it http://gawker.com/5688566/meet-the-volvo+d...ailman-harasser
All said and done the lady should be ashamed for her racist, bigoted behavior.

EDIT: Found it http://gawker.com/5688566/meet-the-volvo+d...ailman-harasser
I spoke to a mail carrier today. He told me that the carrier from the video was indeed fired, but not for the incident on the video. He wasn't doing his job. Apparently skipping duties such as monitoring relay boxes and "not caring" about his duties. "They" had been watching him for some time... the final straw was when he drove over and ripped up a residential lawn with the mail truck...
Why couldn't he take back the mail if the recipient DECLARED she wasn't the right person after the fact (even if she had signed for it)? Something doesn't sound right.
And that high-class lady has such a beautiful house - too beautiful to be degrading other people.
And that high-class lady has such a beautiful house - too beautiful to be degrading other people.
Originally Posted by Nin009,Nov 16 2010, 01:16 PM
You realize she signed for a certified letter? He can't take it back.
If you are going to call people out for being dumb, perhaps you could do a better job of proofreading your rant. I think you brought dumb to a whole new level. Now get me some fries, bitch.
If you are going to call people out for being dumb, perhaps you could do a better job of proofreading your rant. I think you brought dumb to a whole new level. Now get me some fries, bitch.
By the way, I'm not condoning that racist bitch, but not being able to take back a signed letter by a wrong recipient doesn't sound right.
Originally Posted by RedCelica,Nov 15 2010, 11:32 AM
I can't believe the audacity of that mailman...getting the wrong person and then refusing to take the letter back. I'm glad he was fired. We don't need people that dumb working in out postal service...they can make me fries.
Originally Posted by Steponme,Nov 16 2010, 09:24 PM
Show me a postal policy (even de facto) that says a signed letter cannot be taken back even if it was signed and received by a wrong person. Say if I had signed for a letter without looking carefully at the name, why would the post office want me, as a wrong recipient, to keep someone else's certified mail? Does NOT make sense at all!
By the way, I'm not condoning that racist bitch, but not being able to take back a signed letter by a wrong recipient doesn't sound right.
By the way, I'm not condoning that racist bitch, but not being able to take back a signed letter by a wrong recipient doesn't sound right.
Don't sign your name next to things you don't want, end of story.
Originally Posted by whiteflash,Nov 17 2010, 12:02 PM
That is the policy for a ton of good reasons. Certied mail, is certified for a reason. Don't sign for it if you don't want it, once you've signed it you've taken possession of it. Imagine if that was a check, why would the USPS want liability of a driver holding a check thats been confirmed as delivered? The USPS guy could easily take that check and run with it, and it'd make things very difficult to track at that point.
Don't sign your name next to things you don't want, end of story.
Don't sign your name next to things you don't want, end of story.
Originally Posted by Nin009,Nov 16 2010, 05:16 PM
You realize she signed for a certified letter? He can't take it back.
If you are going to call people out for being dumb, perhaps you could do a better job of proofreading your rant. I think you brought dumb to a whole new level. Now get me some fries, bitch.
If you are going to call people out for being dumb, perhaps you could do a better job of proofreading your rant. I think you brought dumb to a whole new level. Now get me some fries, bitch.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







