Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

euler's formula

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #11  
Gymkata's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,720
Likes: 0
Default





Oh, snap! Beautiful
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Gymkata,Aug 26 2006, 07:34 PM
Beautiful
Regarding your signature: "corpes"?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 11:21 PM
  #13  
Dantheman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 0
From: RSM
Default

I remember back in calculus where my teacher proved that formula for fun. It took almost 2 days (I think this was the one) and it wasn't something we even needed to know.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 01:31 AM
  #14  
IheartS2ks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Default

I only hate math because (like many things we hate) I don't understand it.


It doesn't appeal to my creative side. Its like, okay here's a problem and get THE answer...
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #15  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

I barely squeaked through my third semester calculus so I guess I'm just barely human.

I guess it depends on your work but the number of times I need anything more complicated than first semester calculus (in mfg/process engineering for electronics and material development) is awfully rare. Heck, even my statistics/DOE analysis is automated (two thumbs up for Statgraphics!).
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #16  
S2020's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

Originally Posted by IheartS2ks,Aug 27 2006, 01:31 AM
I only hate math because (like many things we hate) I don't understand it.


It doesn't appeal to my creative side. Its like, okay here's a problem and get THE answer...
I disagree. Basic math is very rote but higher math can be quite creative.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #17  
S2020's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

Originally Posted by S2Kguy,Aug 26 2006, 06:15 PM
The only thing I know about what you wrote is that if it's a problem, what's in the paranthesis is done first, and I only know that because Bill told me a matter of hours ago.

Beautiful? Not so much.
huh??
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 01:31 PM
  #18  
IheartS2ks's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by S2020,Aug 27 2006, 12:57 PM
I disagree. Basic math is very rote but higher math can be quite creative.
Well I should have rephrased.

I'm really interested in some things about math, and those ARE the higher equations that deal mostly with theory and delve into other areas like physics. With those even though I don't understand the math part fully, I still think what they are talking about is interesting. And I can contribute to the discussion. These problems open the discussion up and it's not quite a closed circuit by mearly focusing on the math.

Math never clicked with me, well it did, but I could never explain it. I would get the answer but not explain how I got it. It just seemed like "common sense" for the more basic math. Once I was penalized for doing something different (albeit wrong) I said "screw this" and found some thing that was immediately creative: english, music, art.

It was not until college where I started to think math was really fun. I had liberal arts math that dealt with cool patterns and theories like the pigeonhole theory and the golden ratio. Unfortunately the teacher was completely inept and the students, freshmen at the time had to teach themselves, and as a result I didn't learn too much and left, once again, another sour taste of math in my mouth.


Math as a whole is extremely creative and it is always growing, but I'll never get to that point. Plus the ultimate aim of math isn't something I'm interested in. But I'm a bit of an oddball when it comes to critcizing math.

And when I think of higher level math, I think of the movie Pi. It doesn't look fun, no matter how creative.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 02:13 PM
  #19  
magician's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: Yorba Linda, CA
Default

Originally Posted by IheartS2ks,Aug 27 2006, 01:31 PM
I had liberal arts math that dealt with cool patterns and theories like the pigeonhole theory and the golden ratio. Unfortunately the teacher was completely inept and the students, freshmen at the time had to teach themselves, and as a result I didn't learn too much and left, once again, another sour taste of math in my mouth.
Many years ago I taught a liberal arts math course. This was at a time when I was given carte blanche on the subjects I covered: as long as it was mathematics, it was fine.

We started using the textbook and covered standard stuff like balancing one's chequebook. Boring!

I switched gears. We covered some abstract algebra: group theory, illustrated by rearranging living room furniture. Then I taught them how to prove Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem. We finished with the Traveling Salesman Problem and the Highway Inspector (or Chinese Postman) Problem. Anything but boring!
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #20  
VisualEchos's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 2
From: Cape Girardeau
Default

Originally Posted by S2020,Aug 27 2006, 12:57 PM
huh??
Which part didn't you understand?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gymkata
Off-topic Talk
4
May 2, 2009 01:27 PM
Fapout
Off-topic Talk
22
May 2, 2009 12:38 PM
wantone
Off-topic Talk
2
Mar 13, 2007 09:30 AM
WtbS2k
Off-topic Talk
8
May 21, 2004 01:03 AM
Ratgirl
The Corner
8
Sep 13, 2003 07:53 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:19 AM.