Exxon posts record profit...again
If they don't make the profits in gas, they make them on petrochemicals.
The asphalt issue is a prime example of this: less light sweet crude being refined for gasoline creates a shortage of the sludge necessary for asphalt creation, and thusly, the price of asphalt goes up.
Profits are profits, it's the margins I'm curious about. . . and that, we'll never really know.
The asphalt issue is a prime example of this: less light sweet crude being refined for gasoline creates a shortage of the sludge necessary for asphalt creation, and thusly, the price of asphalt goes up.
Profits are profits, it's the margins I'm curious about. . . and that, we'll never really know.
Oh yeah, evil oil companies. Lets shut them all down and not drive.
Seriously, lots of people spend (especially SUV drivers or those with long commutes) as much on gas as they spend to feed themselves. So if the oil company makes a crap load of money its supposed to be shocking?
And a gallon of gas pumped out of the ground half way across the world, shipped to the US, pipelined to a refinery, refined, and then trucked to a gas station still costs less than a gallon of milk produced in the next county.
EVIL DAIRY FARMERS!!!!!!!!!!
Now if we can only make an argument that the high milk prices are somehow Bush and Cheney's fault................
Seriously, lots of people spend (especially SUV drivers or those with long commutes) as much on gas as they spend to feed themselves. So if the oil company makes a crap load of money its supposed to be shocking?
And a gallon of gas pumped out of the ground half way across the world, shipped to the US, pipelined to a refinery, refined, and then trucked to a gas station still costs less than a gallon of milk produced in the next county.
EVIL DAIRY FARMERS!!!!!!!!!!
Now if we can only make an argument that the high milk prices are somehow Bush and Cheney's fault................
Originally Posted by GPMike' date='Jan 30 2009, 01:32 PM
QFT
Surprisingly though we would not need to be so reliant on OPEC if we were to drill the vast reserves of both coasts of the US, extract shale oil from the Rockies, and "drill baby drill" in Alaska. But that would take too much common sense.
Also, we can do both of these at the same time.....DRILL here and drill NOW, and develop green energy. They are not mutually exclusive. This is ****ing America we should be doing it all. NO EXCUSES!
Surprisingly though we would not need to be so reliant on OPEC if we were to drill the vast reserves of both coasts of the US, extract shale oil from the Rockies, and "drill baby drill" in Alaska. But that would take too much common sense.

Also, we can do both of these at the same time.....DRILL here and drill NOW, and develop green energy. They are not mutually exclusive. This is ****ing America we should be doing it all. NO EXCUSES!
the US is addicted to oil. our infrastructure is based on oil consumption. OPEC control it, and they own us all until we get a huge breakthru in green tech.
obama is not gonna start drilling and destroying our environment so we can have oil for a quarter cheaper per gallon. that idea is just kinda dum.
After all the news about the profits oil companies like Exxon Mobil have made recently I decided to see how other well know companies are doing. I wanted to look at the profit as a percent of revenue since this will put large and small companies on a level field. So we will use Exxon as the base line.
Exxon Mobil Revenue = $464B Profit = $45B = 9.7%
Next I wanted to see how the connected industry, automotive was doing so I looked at the 2 big public domestic makers, GM and Ford. Not much of a shocker if you have watched the news lately, both of these huge companies have a negative profit percentage of revenue.
GM Revenue = $166.10B Profit = $-22.79B = -13.7%
Ford Revenue = $161.2B Profit = $-11.52B = -7.1%
How are some of the well known retailers doing? Let
Exxon Mobil Revenue = $464B Profit = $45B = 9.7%
Next I wanted to see how the connected industry, automotive was doing so I looked at the 2 big public domestic makers, GM and Ford. Not much of a shocker if you have watched the news lately, both of these huge companies have a negative profit percentage of revenue.
GM Revenue = $166.10B Profit = $-22.79B = -13.7%
Ford Revenue = $161.2B Profit = $-11.52B = -7.1%
How are some of the well known retailers doing? Let
Originally Posted by JDM 4shot' date='Feb 1 2009, 05:35 AM
In the 1940's there might have been destruction of the enviroment with some drilling on land. Not the case now. In the water the rigs are like an artifical reef. An overall boon to the enviroment.
I want to see for myself how this is possible.
"Boon" is a bit of a grandiose notion, isn't it? While I'm sure they're more environmentally sound than before, "boon?" Phewwwww. . . Oh, and if you're going to clump Obama in on this, be my guest. . . wait, no, be a member.
Originally Posted by S2020' date='Feb 1 2009, 09:54 AM
link please?
I want to see for myself how this is possible.
I want to see for myself how this is possible.
http://www.cfact.org/site/view_article.asp...5&idarticle=241
More if you like. Well known fact for may years the rigs act like a reef supporting wildlife.
Originally Posted by JDM 4shot' date='Feb 1 2009, 05:35 AM
Obama dose not have the answers. He is taking after what FDR did in the past. Which made the depression worse, and overall years longer then it should have been.
Now to the drill here-drill now stupidity. The oil companies already have tons of land they refuse to drill on, and keep begging for more, probably because it means assets for them. This is on top of the fact that it would take a long-ass time to even get production up to speed, even assuming we had the kinds of reserves the ME does, which we don't. Oil's time has come, and we are only seeing the beginning of what modern technology can do for us.








