Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Fake Rolexes FTL!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 12:39 AM
  #91  
tokyo_james's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Default

Originally Posted by mxt_77,Jul 6 2007, 05:42 AM
Anybody that thinks they can gain any insight to another person just by looking at the watch they're wearing is a very misguided person.
If a person is wearing a very nice watch, it could be because they're:
- very wealthy and appreciate nice things.
- living on a shoestring budget and maxed out their credit cards so they could impress people with their watch
- related to or friends with someone that gave them the watch as a gift/heirloom.

If someone is wearing a fake nice watch, it could be because they're:
- trying to pretend that they're something they're not.
- interested in nice watches, but realize that they can get more value by buying a knock-off
- not smart enough to realize they got ripped off.

If someone is wearing a cheap watch, it could be because they're:
- flat broke.
- not willing to spend more than 50 bucks on a device whose sole purpose is to tell them what time it is. Even if it's off by a couple of seconds a year, how many people really need to know the time within .0001 seconds?
- not interested in wearing accessories that could make them a more likely target for a would-be mugger.

So... unless you know the actual reasoning behind the type of watch someone is wearing, there's nothing you can honestly tell just by seeing the device wrapped around their wrist. But, it does sound like you're the type of person that would try to make a statement with their accessories. Personally, I'd rather people judge me by my actions, not by what I own.
Surely you have just disproved your own point by telling us what each person is like based on the watch that they are wearing ....
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 01:56 AM
  #92  
OCMusicJunkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: Orange County
Default

Originally Posted by NFRs2000NYC,Jul 5 2007, 10:23 PM
This watch retails for $18,500 dollars.
I'm certain there is a reason, but could you please school me how a watch with no complications can be worth that much? Is the movement handmade, are the jewels real instead of created, ect?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 04:58 AM
  #93  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

Originally Posted by mxt_77,Jul 5 2007, 06:20 PM
You just don't get it, do you? A watch says nothing about a person without knowing how or why they obtained the watch.
MX, i'm not so sure that YOU get it....

for the most part, people buy their own watches. maybe 1 in a thousand is given.

you need to get off that band wagon is it's the extreme example...not the norm.

Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #94  
CKit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by mxt_77,Jul 5 2007, 02:20 PM
You just don't get it, do you? A watch says nothing about a person without knowing how or why they obtained the watch.

But, hey... if you want to judge me based on my Casio, that's your prerogative. But, as I said... you will be very misguided in doing so.
I'm baffled at the people who think you can't tell ANYTHING about someone based on external observations. Of course it doesn't tell you everything, and of course first impressions may be wrong.

I don't think anyone is debating that (I hope).

But to say that you can't or shouldn't tell ANYTHING (or "nothing" [sic]) based on appearances is silly as well.

First impressions count for something. Depending on your line of work, how you look (and a watch may play a role) can significantly impact the opportunities you get.

I wouldn't walk into an interview with my hair uncombed and my tie crooked. If I did, it wouldn't mean I was a bad job candidate, but things are the way they are.

But it is all within context. I would be wary of a job applicant for a $30k per year job with a $10k watch... it might be an indication of unrealistic expectations or priorities. It may not, but I'd be "on guard" if I was interviewing.

I personally pick things that in my opinion are nice, functional, and don't project excess. Depending on your job and peer group, this varies widely. I think some of the responses we're getting reflect this.

I'm going to post a new poll regarding this.... stay tuned.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #95  
The Gasman's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 59,195
Likes: 1
From: Ventura, California, USA
Default

Foggedaboutit. I wear a 100 dollar casio. I could easily afford a 10k watch, but it's not my thing. My usual dress is a t shirt and jeans and maybe a fleece if it's cold. Most of my tshirts are well worn so they are comfortable and soft, the same with the jeans.

I do this because 1. I like being comfortable
2. My finantial advisor does the same and recommended it saying if you look like a target, people will target you.


So some of you are argueing that my appearance equals my net worth?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #96  
CKit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by s2000raj,Jul 6 2007, 11:36 AM
So some of you are arguing that my appearance equals my net worth?
Maybe some people are arguing that, but that's silly too.

The appearance suggests a certain image. That image may be desireable when relaxing on the weekend. When not at work or not out on a date with the wife, I prefer NO watch at all (and jeans and a 10-yr old T-shirt).

But in a situation where you're supposed to put your best foot forward (work perhaps?) looking cheap / sloppy could make your work more difficult, especially if you deal with people you're meeting for the first time.

Obviously if you work someplace where function rules, an electronic or rubberized watch may be preferable.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 01:33 PM
  #97  
fperra's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Default

As the saying goes, different strokes for different folks. I love fine mechanical watches. and will continue to add to my collection. At this point in my life I wouldn't be caught with a quarts electronic watch, although in my younger years thats all I wore. Time doesn't pass in 1 second ticks, but it flys by continuously. Here is a picture of part of my collection:



From left to right, Orient Star Diver, Omega Seamaster Chronograph, Seiko GMT Springdrive, Steinhart 39 mm GMT Diver, Steinhart 42 mm GMT Diver, Rolex Yatch-Master, Ball Engineer Hydrocarbon Chronograph, and Omega Seamaster GMT (Bond version).

My next purchase will be an Omega Speadmaster(Moon Watch).
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 05:01 PM
  #98  
CKit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,729
Likes: 8
Default

That's a nice collection!

(What did you say your address was? )
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #99  
Muz's Avatar
Muz
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,081
Likes: 0
Default

I must admit (despite appreciating a nice watch myself) that I rarely notice what anyone else is wearing.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 05:56 PM
  #100  
freq's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20,983
Likes: 188
From: in my garage
Default

I own a Timex IronMan, I bought it in prison over 10 years ago. I never wear it though, it stays in my backpack.

I do not own a suit or a tie let alone a "tux" although I did get fitted for a "tux" today to wear as a groomsman.

My cellphone tells me what time it is, that is, when I carry my cell phone. I do own an S2000 but even that has no clock in it.

I guess knowing what time it is is rarely that important to me.

Nothing more to add here.

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 AM.