Ferrari's, Porsche's and the superexotics.
Hey there guys. I been wondering something about superexotics cars. It seems these days makers like Ford and other companies are seeming to approach supercar terriotry performance costing 3 times less. Are really Porsche and Ferrari's really that much better then other "lower" car manufacturers? I don't mean to offend anyone just I am curious why you pay so much for something but performance is somewhat the same.... If anyone can give me insight on this matter I will appreciate it. Also Steve C, you own a 911TT can you tell me the performance of the car?
I truly believe Ferrari's and Porsche's are up there for a reason, but yet I can't seem to find the "reason" why....
-Thanks
Alan
I truly believe Ferrari's and Porsche's are up there for a reason, but yet I can't seem to find the "reason" why....
-Thanks
Alan
Simple answer: because of their status.
Is any exotic worth the money? No! But the rich have money and they can spend on whatever they desire regardless of worth. To the poor, a car is a mere transportation and shouldn't cost too much. To the rich, cars are toys and entertainment.
Is any exotic worth the money? No! But the rich have money and they can spend on whatever they desire regardless of worth. To the poor, a car is a mere transportation and shouldn't cost too much. To the rich, cars are toys and entertainment.
Originally Posted by yellafeva,Sep 3 2004, 02:36 PM
Simple answer: because of their status.
Is any exotic worth the money? No! But the rich have money and they can spend on whatever they desire regardless of worth. To the poor, a car is a mere transportation and shouldn't cost too much. To the rich, cars are toys and entertainment.
Is any exotic worth the money? No! But the rich have money and they can spend on whatever they desire regardless of worth. To the poor, a car is a mere transportation and shouldn't cost too much. To the rich, cars are toys and entertainment.
Originally Posted by doodlebug,Sep 3 2004, 01:42 PM
...so to follow your reasoning, the S2000 isn't worth the money.
Originally Posted by yellafeva,Sep 3 2004, 02:45 PM
Nope, because it's not a convenient vehicle. It's also part "toy". But then again, it is only $33K, not over $100K. Btw, I was talking about "exotics", which normally cost much more than $100K. At that point, it's not about worth anymore, it's about privilege. 

Trending Topics
...personally, I think the S2000 is worth the money...and if I was in a higher tax bracket I would think that the 360 Modena would be worth the money...and an even higher one I would buy an Enzo or McLaren F1 and still think that I got good value for my money....but, I can only dream about that!
Originally Posted by doodlebug,Sep 3 2004, 01:49 PM
...but I'm sure there are some "poor" people that think $33K is alot of money for a car (especially one with only two seats)...and hence, not worth the $.




