Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Ha ha O'Reilly OWNED!

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 11:51 AM
  #111  
SilverKnight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,418
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

looks like honda has one and only one person on his side ninethreeeleven who says in a PM he is supporter of Kerry and Honda606 views
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 11:54 AM
  #112  
hellothere's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by honda606,Sep 30 2004, 11:50 AM
Why isn't it?
why isn't it fair to only increase the tax for them? why should they pay an unequal amount as everyone else is? they should pay a higher precentage because they make more? whats the logic behind that?

for example, a millionaire wants to build a huge house...he hires contractors (blue collar workers) to build it...trickle down economics...less taxes=more spending=better economy

have you ever taken an economics class or training?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 11:55 AM
  #113  
hellothere's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Default

never mind the economics of it...why should the rich be unfairly taxed?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #114  
Gink5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
From: Newtown,PA
Default

You know big brother put chips in the s2k so they can watch you. Look OUT
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #115  
Russian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default

never mind the economics of it...why should the rich be unfairly taxed?
Because they're ignorant!
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #116  
hellothere's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Default

wait i know the answer...to pay for social programs and big government...why would you want that? dont you want to keep the money you earned?

so what if we lower the meaning of "rich" lets say it is income over $40,000. and now you have to pay more taxes. would you like that?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 11:58 AM
  #117  
honda606's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 7
From: houston
Default

Why shouldn't they? I've still yet to hear a good answer other than "because it isn't fair."

Life isn't fair last time I checked the innocent civilian body count in Iraq.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 11:59 AM
  #118  
Gink5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
From: Newtown,PA
Default

I like how the off topic, topic, got off topic.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 12:00 PM
  #119  
Gink5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
From: Newtown,PA
Default

Last time i checked saddam was a really nice man.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2004 | 12:00 PM
  #120  
Russian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default

The top 50% pays 98% of taxes. If you don't think that's a good reason then you're stupid.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 AM.