Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

help article about crank size and gender of kids!

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 6, 2008 | 08:41 PM
  #11  
Archon007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

LOL...I actually read about a study a while back. Some researcher said "beautiful" or "attractive" parents were more likely to have girls.

I got this from the interwebs

Very attractive individuals are 26 per cent less likely to have a son, according to research by Dr Satoshi Kanazawa of LSE's Interdisciplinary Institute of Management.

Dr Kanazawa's work has been published in the Journal of Theoretical Biology

He explains: 'The generalized Trivers-Willard hypothesis (gTWH) (Kanazawa, 2005) proposes that parents who possess any heritable trait which increases the male reproductive success at a greater rate than female reproductive success in a given environment will have a higher-than-expected offspring sex ratio, and parents who possess any heritable trait which increases the female reproductive success at a greater rate than male reproductive success in a given environment will have a lower-than-expected offspring sex ratio.

'One heritable trait which increases the reproductive success of daughters much more than that of sons is physical attractiveness. I therefore predict that physically attractive parents have a lower-than-expected offspring sex ratio (more daughters).

'Further, if beautiful parents have more daughters and physical attractiveness is heritable, then, over evolutionary history, women should gradually become more attractive than men. The analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) confirm both of these hypotheses. Very attractive individuals are 26 per cent less likely to have a son, and women are significantly more physically attractive than men in the representative American sample.'

Ends

For more information contact Dr Kanazawa by email: s.kanazawa@lse.ac.uk For more on his other research, see his staff page
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #12  
wraith5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Moving
Default

[QUOTE=Archon007,Sep 6 2008, 08:41 PM]LOL...I actually read about a study a while back.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2008 | 07:32 AM
  #13  
Scot's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

seriously!!!! I thought i recalled something about the swim legnth for the seman... .the boy semans are like sprinters but give up quickly.... the girls are slower but will swim longer...

so... 12" cock = short sprint to the baby land
3" cock = long swim


Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 04:46 PM
  #14  
Scot's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

anyone????
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #15  
zdave87's Avatar
Member
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82,468
Likes: 1,193
Default

Originally Posted by Scot,Sep 7 2008, 11:32 AM
seriously!!!! I thought i recalled something about the swim legnth for the seman... .the boy semans are like sprinters but give up quickly.... the girls are slower but will swim longer...

so... 12" cock = short sprint to the baby land
3" cock = long swim

Your boys drown or something?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #16  
Luckyaze's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

HOLY SHIT!!!! I have two sisters and 6 BROTHERS!!!!!! No wonder my mom always look so happy.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:50 PM
  #17  
S2020's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

Originally Posted by triman54,Sep 6 2008, 07:18 PM
What happens if you father a boy and a girl?
then you're only slightly more endowed than a man who had a girl then a boy.....
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 09:57 PM
  #18  
S2020's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

[QUOTE=Scot,Sep 7 2008, 07:32 AM] seriously!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 04:43 AM
  #19  
Scot's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

^ :lunatic:

I completely forgot about the big pussy theory!!!

I just like busting on my brother in law and father in law who have only had girls for their kids (8 between the 2 of them with no boys).... so i figured if I could find something that said they had small dicks it would be even more fun.....
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 07:40 AM
  #20  
INTJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,504
Likes: 0
Default

The evo bio thing is BS. By what metrics?! Surgery changes the outcome, fertility is not associated with "attractiveness", there are very few if any selection processes at work in society.

Even his goddamn theory is not supported by his question. What is the mechanism to change the sex ratio based on attractiveness? The male is the only contributor to the sex of the child.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dyhppy
Off-topic Talk
13
Oct 31, 2007 03:47 AM
jasonw
The Corner
3
May 17, 2006 06:56 PM
The Raptor
The Corner
14
Mar 5, 2005 06:44 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 AM.