help article about crank size and gender of kids!
LOL...I actually read about a study a while back. Some researcher said "beautiful" or "attractive" parents were more likely to have girls.
I got this from the interwebs
I got this from the interwebs
Very attractive individuals are 26 per cent less likely to have a son, according to research by Dr Satoshi Kanazawa of LSE's Interdisciplinary Institute of Management.
Dr Kanazawa's work has been published in the Journal of Theoretical Biology
He explains: 'The generalized Trivers-Willard hypothesis (gTWH) (Kanazawa, 2005) proposes that parents who possess any heritable trait which increases the male reproductive success at a greater rate than female reproductive success in a given environment will have a higher-than-expected offspring sex ratio, and parents who possess any heritable trait which increases the female reproductive success at a greater rate than male reproductive success in a given environment will have a lower-than-expected offspring sex ratio.
'One heritable trait which increases the reproductive success of daughters much more than that of sons is physical attractiveness. I therefore predict that physically attractive parents have a lower-than-expected offspring sex ratio (more daughters).
'Further, if beautiful parents have more daughters and physical attractiveness is heritable, then, over evolutionary history, women should gradually become more attractive than men. The analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) confirm both of these hypotheses. Very attractive individuals are 26 per cent less likely to have a son, and women are significantly more physically attractive than men in the representative American sample.'
Ends
For more information contact Dr Kanazawa by email: s.kanazawa@lse.ac.uk For more on his other research, see his staff page
Dr Kanazawa's work has been published in the Journal of Theoretical Biology
He explains: 'The generalized Trivers-Willard hypothesis (gTWH) (Kanazawa, 2005) proposes that parents who possess any heritable trait which increases the male reproductive success at a greater rate than female reproductive success in a given environment will have a higher-than-expected offspring sex ratio, and parents who possess any heritable trait which increases the female reproductive success at a greater rate than male reproductive success in a given environment will have a lower-than-expected offspring sex ratio.
'One heritable trait which increases the reproductive success of daughters much more than that of sons is physical attractiveness. I therefore predict that physically attractive parents have a lower-than-expected offspring sex ratio (more daughters).
'Further, if beautiful parents have more daughters and physical attractiveness is heritable, then, over evolutionary history, women should gradually become more attractive than men. The analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) confirm both of these hypotheses. Very attractive individuals are 26 per cent less likely to have a son, and women are significantly more physically attractive than men in the representative American sample.'
Ends
For more information contact Dr Kanazawa by email: s.kanazawa@lse.ac.uk For more on his other research, see his staff page
seriously!!!! I thought i recalled something about the swim legnth for the seman... .the boy semans are like sprinters but give up quickly.... the girls are slower but will swim longer... 
so... 12" cock = short sprint to the baby land
3" cock = long swim


so... 12" cock = short sprint to the baby land
3" cock = long swim

Originally Posted by Scot,Sep 7 2008, 11:32 AM
seriously!!!! I thought i recalled something about the swim legnth for the seman... .the boy semans are like sprinters but give up quickly.... the girls are slower but will swim longer... 
so... 12" cock = short sprint to the baby land
3" cock = long swim


so... 12" cock = short sprint to the baby land
3" cock = long swim

^ :lunatic:
I completely forgot about the big pussy theory!!!
I just like busting on my brother in law and father in law who have only had girls for their kids (8 between the 2 of them with no boys).... so i figured if I could find something that said they had small dicks it would be even more fun.....
I completely forgot about the big pussy theory!!!

I just like busting on my brother in law and father in law who have only had girls for their kids (8 between the 2 of them with no boys).... so i figured if I could find something that said they had small dicks it would be even more fun.....
The evo bio thing is BS. By what metrics?! Surgery changes the outcome, fertility is not associated with "attractiveness", there are very few if any selection processes at work in society.
Even his goddamn theory is not supported by his question. What is the mechanism to change the sex ratio based on attractiveness? The male is the only contributor to the sex of the child.
Even his goddamn theory is not supported by his question. What is the mechanism to change the sex ratio based on attractiveness? The male is the only contributor to the sex of the child.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








