Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.
View Poll Results: Is it in our nature to fight..start wars
YES- it is in our nature...history tells us.
94.44%
NO
5.56%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Human..and Wars...

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 10:09 AM
  #11  
The Gasman's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 59,195
Likes: 1
From: Ventura, California, USA
Default

Originally Posted by VTEC_Junkie,Jun 20 2005, 06:12 AM
i think, generally, that's what war is: 2 or more groups fighting in an organized (and strategic) fashion.
I didn't make this up. I saw it on a nature show. Not that TV is gospel, but I was repeating this.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 11:59 AM
  #12  
iatacs19's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA
Default

Well if you want something and you are stronger then you take it. It's a rather simple principle...
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 12:25 PM
  #13  
F1s2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

Originally Posted by VTEC_Junkie,Jun 20 2005, 09:12 AM
i think, generally, that's what war is: 2 or more groups fighting in an organized (and strategic) fashion.
War can be between two people or 1 million people and animals as well.[n] an active struggle between competing entities Animals are constantly struggling and competing for food, mates or territory. So yes animals also go to war.

WAR
Definition: [n] a concerted campaign to end something that is injurious; "the war on poverty"; "the war against crime"
[n] the waging of armed conflict against an enemy; "thousands of people were killed in the war"
[n] an active struggle between competing entities; "a price war"; "a war of wits"; "diplomatic warfare"
[n] a legal state created by a declaration of war and ended by official declaration during which the international rules of war apply; "war was declared in November but actual fighting did not begin until the following spring"
[v] make or wage war
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 03:40 PM
  #14  
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley
Default

it's great that the terminology "war" has such an encompassing definition, but nonetheless, when the original poster posted his question, he had only one type of war in mind, basically the same type that most people think of when they hear the term "war", which is 2 or more nations or group engaging in physical combat via millitary, or other types of organized threat, usually as a result of political, religious, or economic conflicts.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 05:48 PM
  #15  
SgtSaunders's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, USA
Default

Ever heard of Guernica? In 1937 Hitler decided to try out his new war machine. Almost a "trial run" for his Luftwaffe. It was the first time that a civilian population was used as a true military objective. The Condor Legion dropped enough bombs to kill half of Guernica, Spain's population. No strategic reason. Goehring used it just to measure how effective a mass bombing was. And so began modern war....

A good reference book is Sun Tzu's "The Art of War". I was given this book by my mgr as a rookie exec but it is more of human psych book that draws little difference between true war-battles and boardroom battles. I've heard wall-street types call it the "modern-day Jedi's bible".
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 05:50 PM
  #16  
F1s2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default

True. But like every other thread. It goes from the original poster to something else.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 08:06 PM
  #17  
Young_R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,033
Likes: 0
From: UNITED STATES
Default

someone voted NO..but no comments...very strange.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #18  
Young_R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,033
Likes: 0
From: UNITED STATES
Default

i really wanted to hear reasons from those who voted NO...because i dont see how they think otherwise but then again...
they voted but no with no reasons behind it so it would just be YES.

far as i'm concern it is still 100% YES
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #19  
no_really's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
From: City
Default

There will always be someone who tries to take with force what he cannot have otherwise. There will always be those who oppose such actions. Therefore, there will always be war, as such. It certainly is human nature, but it is nature, human and otherwise.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #20  
honda606's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,937
Likes: 7
From: houston
Default

So you actually believe that some babies are born to be muderers?

There's no learned behavior...no nothing...just that's the way it is. Bullshit.

The environment creates the individual. Cartoons these days are nothing but fighting. Kids are taught at an early age what they're "supposed" to like and "supposed" to be like.

What about the Amish that don't grow up with phones, television, etc? When was that last Amish Civil War?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:53 PM.