No

 

Bush gets as much flack for the negative state of the economy as Clinton got praise for the positive state of his in his day. Switch their Presidential terms and tell me the result wouldn't have been basically the same at the end of them, give or take.

I wouldn't blame any single element for the current state of things, as there many potential occurrences and influences that could've changed things for the better, but didn't, and there are other things that could've happened to make it worse, but didn't.

I'm hungry, what are you guys having for dinner?

 

pu$$y

 

Hmmm...that sounds good. I'll have what he's having.

The sofa I just bought is covered for "Human Bodily Fluid Stains." I can't wait to call in and tell them there's a special stain on it.

 

Thats really more info than I needed

 

Sorry, but Clinton actually had budget surplus and listened to Greenspan. George W. did not.

 

 

What? And get caught in line with a bunch of Brazilian tourists, with their kids hopping all over the place? I at least know how to chew out rug rats in Spanish. . .

. . . and Raj is right; Disneyworld isn't the happiest place on Earth. That might be Amsterdam. . . or Tijuana if you're in a pinch.

 

the economy is going to shit but at least gas prices are low!

I filled up for $9 cheaper than I did a week ago. from $3.39 a gallon just a week ago to $2.99 last night!!

.....this is said all in sarcasm though, the gas prices are nice