Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

itunes or napster

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 10:06 AM
  #1  
enlightenment's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Agoura Hills
Default itunes or napster

Hey have you guys tried out itunes or the new napster.

I'm liking itunes better for some reason. I think the interface is a little cleaner and they seem to have a better selection of songs. Not a bad service $0.99 per song is not that bad, but it's not as good as free. If they could get the price down a little bit mpre, i think it may succeed..

What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 08:40 PM
  #2  
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37,188
Likes: 4
From: TN
Default

i like itunes a lot, 99 cents a song is not horrible, but the real deal is all the cd's are only 9.99, can't beat 10 dollars for a whole cd no matter how many songs. Interface is kickass.... of course mac's are design oriented anyway, that reminds me... i need to order panther.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 08:59 PM
  #3  
RazorV3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
From: VA is for hustlaz
Default

just stick with kazaa lite
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #4  
EvoVII's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,147
Likes: 0
From: 49th Parallel
Default

haha, yea yea yea, I still prefer the "free" option
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 10:37 PM
  #5  
lig's Avatar
lig
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 11,322
Likes: 188
From: seattle
Default

itunes is excellent!
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2003 | 10:58 PM
  #6  
SODA's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Central California
Default

I think that some of the sites are getting all messed up...i still don't wanna pay for the songs....that's why i have DSL for faster!!
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 12:18 AM
  #7  
Quick2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

yeah...the choice is pay for music, or get music for free....i choose the latter.

Quick2K
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 06:13 AM
  #8  
RazorV3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
From: VA is for hustlaz
Default

if im going to spend money online to buy a mp3, even for 99 cents a song, id rather put the extra cash down and get it from the local cd store. i prefer it on a CD.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 06:19 AM
  #9  
gomarlins3's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 23,386
Likes: 104
From: Kuna Idaho
Default

I use the record store. Sorry for doing it the old way and making sure that the artist receives compensation for their work, silly me.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 06:21 AM
  #10  
lig's Avatar
lig
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 11,322
Likes: 188
From: seattle
Default

I personally feel that .99 is a pretty good deal - particularly in light of the fact that I tend to only d/l 5 or 6 songs at the most.

bad karma not to pay the artists in some fashion, IMO
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:29 AM.