Needing to smear a ricer

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jun 22, 2006 | 07:54 PM

#21

sstodvictory

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 259

Likes: 0

From: Central IL

Not me.

I did Email the Administrator of CamaroSource though asking that the photo link be removed, just 5 minutes ago and BANG, its already done. That is good and proper service by CamaroSource!

OK, the fun is over, nothing to see here anymore, move along!

Steve

Jun 29, 2006 | 06:07 AM

#22

bichunmou

Registered User

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 346

Likes: 0

Jun 29, 2006 | 10:24 AM

#23

Mr.E.G.

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 6,281

Likes: 119

Quote:

Originally Posted by Incubus,Jun 22 2006, 12:08 PM

Speaking of the Arial Atom..."You drop any other powerplant in that car and will get better results."

What is wrong with this statement?

ohhh ohhh, i know. because they already have a chevy powerplant option and the honda powered verion takes a juicey dump all over it. is that what you were referring to.

Jun 29, 2006 | 10:37 AM

#24

shotiable

Registered User

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 5,539

Likes: 3

From: sunny suisun

awww... no more fun....

Jun 30, 2006 | 07:52 PM

#25

exceltoexcel

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 4,938

Likes: 0

From: limerick

It's not about displacement its about horsepower and torque.

:egad:

There have been many 300ci+ engines that produced <100 hp and <100 lbft of torque

Jun 30, 2006 | 08:13 PM

#26

exceltoexcel

Registered User

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 4,938

Likes: 0

From: limerick

How check out these CIs

1932 Ford V-8 Cabriolet: 65 horsepower, 221 cu.in. displacement, 2,398 lbs.,

This was the largest V8, compensated engine ever produced up to 1931. It was lighter, more compact, quiet, powerful; it gave good acceleration and was "roar"-free. A 90