Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Question about police radar

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 05:24 AM
  #11  
JonasM's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,211
Likes: 135
From: Euclid, OH
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by RED MX5
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 07:38 AM
  #12  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

Originally posted by JonasM
However, POP radar is not admissible in court (not all jurisdictions know this). It's in their manual. POP radar doesn't give a very accurate reading, but can be used to identify a speeder, then flip to non-POP mode to get the correct reading.

There's a good explanation on The Valentine One's Site.

As to moving radar, there are units that will automatically subtract the cop's car's speed from the reading. They've had that for many years.

JonasM
The legality of POP has not yet been challenged here (as far as know), but the current generation POP units are highly questionable due to their single measurement. Older units require two consecutive, identical, readings to achieve lock, which insures accuracy. The current POP units use a single pulse and this can cause false readings; hence a POP ticket should be easy to challenge, but somebody is going to have to spend the time doing it to set a precedent. Second generation POP units will use multiple pulses and have higher accuracy, but they will never be as much of a threat as the optical units. So far the only optical units I've seen are stationary, but moving optical speed measurement is right around the corner.

What really bugs me is that the cameras TRW put along Georgia's Interstates all have the capability to read vehicle speeds. So far they haven't been using them to pass out tickets, but it is just a matter of time.

RED
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 08:28 AM
  #13  
wannabuy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
Default

Cameras, YUCK.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 09:43 AM
  #14  
s2kdriver80's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 8
From: Long Island, New York, US
Default

1. What if the cop was deep into the right shoulder of the highway and you're driving in the left lane of a 5 lane highway (10 lanes both sides). As you get closer to where the cop is situated, I believe the cop will get inaccurate speed readings. The indicated reading would approach 0 mph when you are exactly perpendicular to the cop (since there would be no relative speed differences at that angle) and then as you move away again, the radar can once again pick up more accurate readings. Is this correct? But perhaps, the radar can compensate for this?

2. How would you know the cop used POP radar to even challenge it?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 10:42 AM
  #15  
Rio S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Your number 1 statement is true, but honestly no cop is stupid enough to take a reading at these positions/angles especially when he is exactly next to you when you guys are traveling in opposite directions. You have to remember cops are not dummies, they don't just 1) point 2) shoot 3)write tickets if the number is greater than legal speed limit ... Well, maybe they do, but they still do have some training regarding the use of the radar units they use.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 10:59 AM
  #16  
s2kdriver80's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 8
From: Long Island, New York, US
Default

I guess you're right - even if the reading produced is at an oblique angle, the reading would always be <= to your true speed so always works to the motorists' favor assuming the radar is calibrated correctly. Anyone know the answer to #2?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 07:16 PM
  #17  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by SiDriver
I guess you're right - even if the reading produced is at an oblique angle, the reading would always be <= to your true speed so always works to the motorists' favor assuming the radar is calibrated correctly.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2004 | 07:46 PM
  #18  
RazorV3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
From: VA is for hustlaz
Default

that's how i got my first ticket, the cop on his bike got me while driving the opposite direction. i learned my lesson alright .
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alpha8a
Off-topic Talk
14
Oct 6, 2008 08:45 AM
Sabre
Off-topic Talk
12
Apr 18, 2008 05:01 AM
bissell77
Off-topic Talk
7
Mar 31, 2007 11:03 PM
drewchie
Off-topic Talk
1
Aug 29, 2004 03:45 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 PM.