RSX-S dyno chart
gotta love the steady decrease in torque from 3k to 6k... wonder what that feels like. looking at the charts makes me think they should start the VTEC 500-1k RPM sooner.
Isn't there a chip mod or something that can change the VTEC changeover point? That seems like it would be an easy way to increase power. [bracing for dumb question flames]
Isn't there a chip mod or something that can change the VTEC changeover point? That seems like it would be an easy way to increase power. [bracing for dumb question flames]
Originally posted by dsp
gotta love the steady decrease in torque from 3k to 6k... wonder what that feels like. looking at the charts makes me think they should start the VTEC 500-1k RPM sooner.
Isn't there a chip mod or something that can change the VTEC changeover point? That seems like it would be an easy way to increase power. [bracing for dumb question flames]
gotta love the steady decrease in torque from 3k to 6k... wonder what that feels like. looking at the charts makes me think they should start the VTEC 500-1k RPM sooner.
Isn't there a chip mod or something that can change the VTEC changeover point? That seems like it would be an easy way to increase power. [bracing for dumb question flames]
the only replacement ECU on the market right now is either the Mugen or the Spoon.
Originally posted by mingster
you can get a VAFC to change the VTEC engagement point.
the only replacement ECU on the market right now is either the Mugen or the Spoon.
you can get a VAFC to change the VTEC engagement point.
the only replacement ECU on the market right now is either the Mugen or the Spoon.
Maybe the RSXR plot is "curvy" b/c the motor isn't broken in yet?
Oddly, the horsepower is smooth while the torque isn't. Anyone else find that rather odd?
My butt dyno resembles the horsepower curve - smooth (albeit less exciting than an S2000) power delivery from 3000-8000.
My butt dyno resembles the horsepower curve - smooth (albeit less exciting than an S2000) power delivery from 3000-8000.
Trending Topics
Just eyeballing an S2K chart and the RSX-S charts, one can clearly see the i-vtec benefits. More torque in the common street RPM ranges. Since the two motors are related, I wonder if there is any hybrid potential. Variable cam timing relative to the crank is one of the ways BMW achieves such wide range motors. They call it vanos. An S2K with i-vtec would feel "larger" in the street rev ranges. As if there were more cubic inches. Eventually Honda will do this on the s2k IMO.
While they can't yet make it work with ultra high revs, BMW has an even better approach where they ditch the throttle body (!) and use the intake valves for this purpose. That one is called valvetronic. They open the valves as much and for as long as the motor requires. So at idle they just crack them open. But at high revs there is too much friction. Lotsa smart folks out there eh?
Stan
While they can't yet make it work with ultra high revs, BMW has an even better approach where they ditch the throttle body (!) and use the intake valves for this purpose. That one is called valvetronic. They open the valves as much and for as long as the motor requires. So at idle they just crack them open. But at high revs there is too much friction. Lotsa smart folks out there eh?
Stan
Originally posted by E30M3
Lotsa smart folks out there eh?
Stan
Lotsa smart folks out there eh?
Stan
i know a fellow board member whose mind churns probably a thousand times faster than mine, i can never keep up with him - which explains why he is where he is in the place he works at today. (t, you readin' this?!
)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oah4566
Off-topic Talk
9
May 20, 2004 07:38 AM







