Prosecution is pretty much done after today. They showed the decomposed bodies of lacey and her baby. I guess her bod was crystalized had ribs poking out, bugs living on her....the baby had a rope knot around his neck......

So you guys think he did it and will get time??

I think he did, who else would kill her???? I mean why woudl they kill her and her baby shes not famous, points all to scott but the defense lawyer was really good.

 

I think OJ did it. Or that Scott hired OJ to do it.

But yeah, I think Scott had done it.

 

From what I've read about the case, it definitely seems like he did it.

It's just really sad.

 

from what I've read, I strongly suspect he did it.

the crazy thing is, the day they found her body and the body of the infant, a friend of mine and I were going to go for a walk by the waterfront at the exact place that the bodies were found. last minute, we decided to go to a different park and I'm glad we did. I don't think I could've handled seeing such a horrific sight.

 

^ i think there would had been a police line preventing you from seeing this horrific sight...unless you were the ones that found the body...

btw, don't want to sound like a sicko or anything, but anyone have a link to the decomposed bodies...in case it has leaked out...

 

^ oh yeah, sorry wasn't clear. we woulda been there before the body was discovered... that is, there is a fair chance we would have been the ones to have stumbled upon it.

 

ugh... i would have freaked. then again, after watching Spike's CSI Marathon last week, who knows

 

I'd say he did it.

That said, I don't think he'll be found guilty. He's a liar (in my opinion) but I don't think he'll be found guilty. Just too many loose ends that were exploited by the defense. Let's not forget that the defense has yet to present their side fully...

 

Honestly, I don't think he did it, and he definitely won't be found guilty (though I'm not from the area, so I only have the national news accounts to go by). As far as I can tell, the police case doesn't hold water (even the parts they didn't cover up).

No one is this good at covering up a crime, especially one of this magnitude. The witnesses that saw her, both at the dock (which the police left out because it hurt their case) and walking her dog the morning of the disappearance... To me it really doesn't add up. And you can't really say he's acted guilty. Who knows how you'd in that situation?

I really think there would at least be some physical evidence.

 

Just too much circumstantial evidence in this case against Scott, plus his demeanor just isn't consonant with a husband that had his wife and baby murdered... I believe he did it.

Gerragos (sp) is good though... Scott might just see daylight out of this case...