Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Viewer sues NBC over a Fear Factor episode

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:24 AM
  #1  
JerseyGirl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 1
From: It's a secret!
Default Viewer sues NBC over a Fear Factor episode

Viewer sues over Fear Factor rat episode

Associated Press
Posted January 7 2005, 9:43 AM EST

CLEVELAND - A viewer is suing NBC for $2.5 million, contending that he threw up because of a "Fear Factor" episode in which contestants ate rats mixed in a blender.

Austin Aitken told The Associated Press he watches "Fear Factor" often and had no problem with past installments where the reality show's participants ate worms and insects in pursuit of a $50,000 prize - but eating rats went "too far."

"It's barbaric, some of the things they ask these individuals to do," Aitken said Thursday.

Aitken's handwritten lawsuit contends the rat-eating made his blood pressure rise, resulting in being dizzy and lightheaded - and vomiting. Because he was disoriented he ran into a doorway, "causing suffering, injury and great pain."

Asked why he didn't shut off his television before the rat-eating segment, Aitken said he couldn't do it quick enough.

NBC responded with a brief statement: "We believe that the claim is completely without merit."

Aitken, a 49-year-old part-time paralegal, said he wants to send a message to NBC and other networks with the lawsuit. He said he isn't concerned with winning a cash judgment in court.

"I just put any figure. You really think I expect to get $2.5 million?" he said.

______


Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:33 AM
  #2  
ajlafleche's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 0
From: West Springfield MA
Default

Whatever judge has this put on his docket should immediately dismiss it as frivolous, assess this twit with court costs and take away his TV rights. For ever.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:43 AM
  #3  
JerseyGirl's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 1
From: It's a secret!
Default

I clearly remember that episode. ALL of the commercials clearly showed that the one stunt was going to involve blended rats. So either this guy saw the commercials, knew what was coming, and watched anyway or that he somehow missed all of the commercials?! I'm not buying it.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:44 AM
  #4  
73Zero's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,078
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

What a loser

Most people know what this show is about, and what may be the result of watching such a thing....geez
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:47 AM
  #5  
CyrusA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Default

haha this is stupid. man.. what people will do for quick cash
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 12:19 PM
  #6  
SkullDeezay's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

His lawsuit is causing my blood pressure to rise. Maybe I should sue him.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 01:12 PM
  #7  
esracer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, Tx
Default

i sure hope that the rats were dead, cause I could easily see animal rights activists being all over this, I had a pet rat for a couple of years, I really don't like the idea of blending live rats or blending rats that have been killed for this reason, then again I didn't see the show so I don't know what exactly happened.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 01:29 PM
  #8  
no_really's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
From: City
Default

Well, if I was the judge facing this suit, I'd certainly agree to hear it. What right does a network have to broadcast, over public airwaves, content that can be demonstrated to cause intestinal distress in viewers? Is it logical to suggest that sex and violence are the only objectionable things in society? Is there a greater good being served by televised humiliation and disgust? Shouldn't citizens be allowed recompense for unanticipated suffering? Sure, blended rats were mentioned in the lead-up to the segment, but how is one to accurately determine one's probable reaction to such a lurid spectacle? Personally, this case is probably more appropriate for the FCC, but hey, whatever works. I'm kind of sick of networks being allowed to use the public airwaves for making people sick to their stomachs. Cable, that's fine, since you have to pay to get it, but the public airwaves are a shared resource, and as such, ought not to be used in a fashion that is expressly intended to cause nausea, IMHO
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #9  
hapa's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,671
Likes: 0
From: Terrebonne
Default

Fear Factor is so retarded anyways! The only thing good about it on that show are usually the girls midriffs!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 03:11 PM
  #10  
S2020's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

Originally Posted by no_really,Jan 7 2005, 02:29 PM
Well, if I was the judge facing this suit, I'd certainly agree to hear it. What right does a network have to broadcast, over public airwaves, content that can be demonstrated to cause intestinal distress in viewers? Is it logical to suggest that sex and violence are the only objectionable things in society? Is there a greater good being served by televised humiliation and disgust? Shouldn't citizens be allowed recompense for unanticipated suffering? Sure, blended rats were mentioned in the lead-up to the segment, but how is one to accurately determine one's probable reaction to such a lurid spectacle? Personally, this case is probably more appropriate for the FCC, but hey, whatever works. I'm kind of sick of networks being allowed to use the public airwaves for making people sick to their stomachs. Cable, that's fine, since you have to pay to get it, but the public airwaves are a shared resource, and as such, ought not to be used in a fashion that is expressly intended to cause nausea, IMHO
Well, watching "Friends" caused me great emotional distress. Who is the arbiter of good taste?
One person's viewpoint should not ruin it for the rest. That viewer has a choice. It's called the "off" button.
It's not as if he is clueless what the show is all about. Unlike the Janet Superbowl debacle, there is no surprise about the show's content.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:44 PM.