The war has begun...
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Tyler, TX
[QUOTE]Originally posted by SeaDoXPL
[B]
I must agree, This kind of rederrick was used by Papa Bush when he said that we are the world's police and we must protect Kuwait.
NWO,,,,, New world order and all that righteous crap.
[B]
I must agree, This kind of rederrick was used by Papa Bush when he said that we are the world's police and we must protect Kuwait.
NWO,,,,, New world order and all that righteous crap.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
From: VA is for hustlaz
Originally posted by smccurry
O.K.
What exactly was your theory on why the U.S. is making enemies of the world and crossing the globe to attack Iraq?
Don't get me wrong, I know America isn't a perfect country and has made/and will make many flawed decisions. I just don't think that this particular action is unjustified.
O.K.
What exactly was your theory on why the U.S. is making enemies of the world and crossing the globe to attack Iraq?
Don't get me wrong, I know America isn't a perfect country and has made/and will make many flawed decisions. I just don't think that this particular action is unjustified.
are you kidding? have you seen all those protests around the world? maybe the leaders of countries won't really say or do anything, but the people around the WORLD are outraged. i have never seen so many people against america. america used to be the good guy, now we are seen as the big bully on the block. (of course they wouldn't show the mass protests on us media).
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,830
Likes: 0
From: Johnson City
Why Iraq when other countries possess weapons of mass destruction, have 'demonstrated' their nuclear capabilities, have leaders as or more ruthless than Saddam and have violated more human rights, have ten times the military infrastructure, have been more provocative, actually turned on targeting radar of aircraft in INTERNATIONAL airspace,lobbed missiles over Japan, and continually threated some kind of military action, working on dual stage rockets that have the potential to hit the West coast of the United States,have violated their demilitarized zone, have boasted restarting a KNOWN nuclear program, and openly sells weapons to terrorists.
To me it seems there are other countries in much higher violation of world and national security than Iraq. It also seems that a lot of our reasons are based on speculation (or evidence that is unavailable to the public). We are talking about countries that we actually have PROOF of making trouble.
What are people's opinions of this? Am I right or wrong?
I'm not saying for or against but to me it seems more immediate threats exist in the world.
To me it seems there are other countries in much higher violation of world and national security than Iraq. It also seems that a lot of our reasons are based on speculation (or evidence that is unavailable to the public). We are talking about countries that we actually have PROOF of making trouble.
What are people's opinions of this? Am I right or wrong?
I'm not saying for or against but to me it seems more immediate threats exist in the world.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,046
Likes: 0
From: VA is for hustlaz
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ccarnel
[B]Why Iraq when other countries possess weapons of mass destruction, have 'demonstrated' their nuclear capabilities, have leaders as or more ruthless than Saddam and have violated more human rights, have ten times the military infrastructure, have been more provocative, actually turned on targeting radar of aircraft in INTERNATIONAL airspace,lobbed missiles over Japan, and continually threated some kind of military action, working on dual stage rockets that have the potential to hit the West coast of the United States,have violated their demilitarized zone, have boasted restarting a KNOWN nuclear program, and openly sells weapons to terrorists.
[B]Why Iraq when other countries possess weapons of mass destruction, have 'demonstrated' their nuclear capabilities, have leaders as or more ruthless than Saddam and have violated more human rights, have ten times the military infrastructure, have been more provocative, actually turned on targeting radar of aircraft in INTERNATIONAL airspace,lobbed missiles over Japan, and continually threated some kind of military action, working on dual stage rockets that have the potential to hit the West coast of the United States,have violated their demilitarized zone, have boasted restarting a KNOWN nuclear program, and openly sells weapons to terrorists.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ccarnel
[B]Why Iraq when other countries possess weapons of mass destruction, have 'demonstrated' their nuclear capabilities, have leaders as or more ruthless than Saddam and have violated more human rights, have ten times the military infrastructure, have been more provocative, actually turned on targeting radar of aircraft in INTERNATIONAL airspace,lobbed missiles over Japan, and continually threated some kind of military action, working on dual stage rockets that have the potential to hit the West coast of the United States,have violated their demilitarized zone, have boasted restarting a KNOWN nuclear program, and openly sells weapons to terrorists.
[B]Why Iraq when other countries possess weapons of mass destruction, have 'demonstrated' their nuclear capabilities, have leaders as or more ruthless than Saddam and have violated more human rights, have ten times the military infrastructure, have been more provocative, actually turned on targeting radar of aircraft in INTERNATIONAL airspace,lobbed missiles over Japan, and continually threated some kind of military action, working on dual stage rockets that have the potential to hit the West coast of the United States,have violated their demilitarized zone, have boasted restarting a KNOWN nuclear program, and openly sells weapons to terrorists.