What's your mechanical aptitude?
Originally Posted by JonBoy,Oct 4 2007, 09:06 AM
410 - 82%. Some of those questions were a bit obtuse or unclear, I thought, and looking back at the answers I can see what I missed or how they reasoned.
Mark, you should've been an engineer.
You beat me on this test.
Mark, you should've been an engineer.
You beat me on this test.Instead I got saddled with a whole different sort of mathematics.

ECE was another possibility, but I have the impression that the US market isn't the best for that the past few years. (Lots of outsourcing and such, for example.)
I just sort of fell into my systems support job. I wouldn't mind a switch to actually creating stuff, rather than just supporting other people's crap. Oh well.
Originally Posted by Elistan,Oct 4 2007, 08:45 AM
Mech-e was a serious consideration for me when I was in high-school looking for a college to attend. I decided on computer science instead because I didn't want to deal with heat transfer mathematics.
Instead I got saddled with a whole different sort of mathematics.
I just sort of fell into my systems support job. I wouldn't mind a switch to actually creating stuff, rather than just supporting other people's crap. Oh well.
Instead I got saddled with a whole different sort of mathematics.

I just sort of fell into my systems support job. I wouldn't mind a switch to actually creating stuff, rather than just supporting other people's crap. Oh well.
The math isn't too bad in "real life" since you have computer programs and even something as simple as Excel to do a lot of the calculations for you. I can do a fifteen page heat transfer problem on two pages in Excel and get it to do iterations for me and solve inside of five or ten seconds. It's really not that bad.
Looking back, university wasn't nearly as difficult as I was told it would be. Lots of work but not necessarily too difficult.
Then again, a non-engineer just beat me in a mechanical aptitude test, so maybe I didn't learn as much as I thought.
Originally Posted by JonBoy,Oct 4 2007, 10:06 AM
410 - 82%. Some of those questions were a bit obtuse or unclear, I thought, and looking back at the answers I can see what I missed or how they reasoned.
"force of 50psi"
Originally Posted by JonBoy,Oct 4 2007, 10:58 AM
I know how you feel. I'm writing my Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam on October 27 as a precursor to becoming a Professional Engineer and I'm getting my butt kicked by things that I've forgotten. I haven't done heat transfer/thermodynamics/engine cycles/calculus (!) in years, really, and I've forgotten all the little tricks and rules.
I started the FE sample test (first 60 questions or so) in the back of my review book last night and I'd say I'd get about 50% of them "easily" just based on what I know right now, so I'm trusting I can get through it no problem.
It's the second section in the afternoon that I think is going to be tougher.
It's the second section in the afternoon that I think is going to be tougher.
Originally Posted by tenshi0,Oct 4 2007, 09:20 AM
86%...and I am an engineer!
How do circuit diagrams test your mechanical aptitude, anyway?
How do circuit diagrams test your mechanical aptitude, anyway?
Originally Posted by JonBoy,Oct 4 2007, 11:13 AM
I started the FE sample test (first 60 questions or so) in the back of my review book last night and I'd say I'd get about 50% of them "easily" just based on what I know right now, so I'm trusting I can get through it no problem.
It's the second section in the afternoon that I think is going to be tougher.
It's the second section in the afternoon that I think is going to be tougher.



Probably one of the poorly written questions.



spoilsports!