Off-topic Talk Where overpaid, underworked S2000 owners waste the worst part of their days before the drive home. This forum is for general chit chat and discussions not covered by the other off-topic forums.

Who's using Netscape now, Cause I.E. Sucks

Old Jan 25, 2003 | 12:25 PM
  #11  
SEVNT4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,537
Likes: 0
From: Intercontinental
Default

You can download/install the newest netscape and still retain the old 4.xx version. It's worth checking out. Mine's setup that way.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by xviper
[B]I have the older Netscape 4.xx and I find it to be probematic.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2003 | 12:41 PM
  #12  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Originally posted by SEVNT4
You can download/install the newest netscape and still retain the old 4.xx version. It's worth checking out. Mine's setup that way.

I tried that on my last computer and it did some goofy stuff to my netscape email. When I get a link in my email and click it, it uses Netscape as the browser. I just haven't found the nerve to try this with my latest computer.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 08:31 AM
  #13  
djohnston's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Parsippany
Default

I work as an intern for the IT dept. in a local township's public school system. Netscape's browser ( I don't know or care which version) is universally problematical and most teachers that complain about problems surfing the web or accessing their email are attempting to do so with Netscape. Its coding sucks, plain and simple. IE may have more security flaws (and patches), but it works most of the time.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 01:21 PM
  #14  
mntony's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: Rochester
Default

IE development certainly improved its code over the years. And Netscape 4.x has some real issues (although, no more than IE 4.x). But, I don't think I would say Mozilla-based Netscape sucks. What sucks is the poor adherence to standard html at many sites. Many (most?) were developed using - guess what? - MS tools... So, guess which platform is the only one which renders those sites "correctly"???

Tony
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2003 | 01:28 PM
  #15  
SECRET AP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default

Netscape stinks. Too many extras tossed into that package. Mozilla is ok, but again, compatibility is an issue. IE is fine. Mail clients are another story.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 05:26 AM
  #16  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

If you don't want to use IE, try Opera. Significantly fewer code imcompatibilities than NS, uses a tiny amount of memory, and draws sites nearly as fast as IE5.5 does. At one time, I had IE5.5, NS6.x, and Opera (3?) installed and used all 3. NS6 was total garbage - slow, buggy, and took forever to draw pages. Mozilla may be better, but it was a far cry from being useful.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 03:24 PM
  #17  
mntony's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
From: Rochester
Default

I played with Opera several years ago and even then, it was pretty cool. NS7 / Mozilla 1.x apparently "borrowed" the Opera-style tabs for web pages.

Tony
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 06:45 PM
  #18  
The Unabageler's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,448
Likes: 0
From: internet
Default

allowing webguys that claim to be coders write sites that only support IE is a bad idea. use mozilla and help break bad programming habits by complaining to websites that don't render correctly. IE does not follow browser HTML decoding standards as specified in the w3c DOM specs. do a search for those terms if you want more info...but in laymans terms it means microsoft breeds bad internet development and production habits, ultimately resulting in poor QoS.

usually the problem is with the code on a webpage, not mozilla/nutscrape being a bad browser.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 08:33 PM
  #19  
Station's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 2
From: Elk Grove
Default

I'm using the beta version of Safari for Mac. It is warp-speed fast, and so far is working pretty well. There are a few things that I find quirky about the interface, but I'm sure that will all be sorted out before the release.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2003 | 10:20 PM
  #20  
The Unabageler's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,448
Likes: 0
From: internet
Default

i hear good things about safari too...mozilla

btw i had that sig last week
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
John David
Off-topic Talk
46
Nov 18, 2008 09:17 AM
phillys2k
Off-topic Talk
14
Dec 10, 2004 08:35 AM
SMUSHROOMED
Off-topic Talk
26
Feb 19, 2004 04:27 PM



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:14 AM.