crazy offsets only...
Originally Posted by dopesilverstone,Jun 17 2009, 09:19 AM
Its the street where the pavement meets the gutter isn't level
Originally Posted by berlinas2k2,Jun 17 2009, 06:38 PM
Correct, which is why I chose to run wide fenders and get such a lower offset.
The concave face is more exaggerated, a deeper concave face, thus "GT-R Face" is the term to describe it. +29, +22, +15 etc.. they are all GT-R Face.
If you just get the +35, +40, +45 and so on, they are just the normal flare spoke face.
The concave face is more exaggerated, a deeper concave face, thus "GT-R Face" is the term to describe it. +29, +22, +15 etc.. they are all GT-R Face.
If you just get the +35, +40, +45 and so on, they are just the normal flare spoke face.
i hear some people saying too much camber is not good for straight accelerating?
correct me if i am wrong.
Originally Posted by berlinas2k2,Jun 17 2009, 06:38 PM
Correct, which is why I chose to run wide fenders and get such a lower offset.
The concave face is more exaggerated, a deeper concave face, thus "GT-R Face" is the term to describe it. +29, +22, +15 etc.. they are all GT-R Face.
If you just get the +35, +40, +45 and so on, they are just the normal flare spoke face.
The concave face is more exaggerated, a deeper concave face, thus "GT-R Face" is the term to describe it. +29, +22, +15 etc.. they are all GT-R Face.
If you just get the +35, +40, +45 and so on, they are just the normal flare spoke face.
Originally Posted by leo520,Jun 17 2009, 08:35 PM
i saw some of ur thread at FI sections so how are u going to fit those wheels with ur turbo set ups?
i hear some people saying too much camber is not good for straight accelerating?
correct me if i am wrong.
i hear some people saying too much camber is not good for straight accelerating?
correct me if i am wrong.







