Ohio S2000 Club Ohio S2000 Owners Club

09 NSX

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 11, 2007 | 07:53 AM
  #11  
toofast4yalll's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 906
Likes: 10
From: Hoover, AL
Default

^ Any idea why Honda creates a groundbreaking, technologically advanced car, then does virtually nothing to update it and sells it as-is for 10 years? At the end of its run, the car is considered dated, and they have to stop making it and start from the ground up developing a new one. Wouldn't it be cheaper and most likely better for Honda to make sports cars like the Corvette? Same design principle, just tweak certain things to keep up with the times.

NSX changes
92 - nothing
93 - added cupholder (woohoo)
94 - more rubber (not a hard DIY mod either)
95 - DBW, Targa top
96 - nothing
97 - 3.2L, 290bhp motor, 6-speed tranny, bigger brakes
98 - nothing
99 - nothing
00 - leather trim interior
01 - nothing
02 - larger exhaust ports, updated suspension, different headlights, wider rear tires, sold only in targa top
03 - nothing
04 - CD changer
05 - nothing


So from 1997 to 2005, there were only 2 major changes (ex. ports and suspension). No wonder by 2005 the car was considered dated. A MY97 with coilovers would do the same thing. Now, if Honda had spent the R&D time updating the NSX during those years, it would still be on sale right now. If you look at the S2000 progression, it's very similar. Major changes in 04, DBW and traction control along with suspension updates in 06, but no power increase, no brake changes, nothing that would make the owner of a MY00 say "I have to have that car." I'm sure the replacements will be amazing cars, and the S2000 and NSX will still be a great car 10 years from now, but I think both Honda and consumers would benefit from serious upgrades to existing chassis.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 11:15 AM
  #12  
Bullitt44's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,231
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Default

that drawing is old. I do like the looks, and I highly doubt honda will screw up the next gen NSX. I look forward to seeing the final product!
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #13  
JHo's Avatar
JHo
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 14
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by toofast4yalll,Aug 11 2007, 11:53 AM
^ Any idea why Honda creates a groundbreaking, technologically advanced car, then does virtually nothing to update it and sells it as-is for 10 years? At the end of its run, the car is considered dated, and they have to stop making it and start from the ground up developing a new one. Wouldn't it be cheaper and most likely better for Honda to make sports cars like the Corvette? Same design principle, just tweak certain things to keep up with the times.

NSX changes
92 - nothing
93 - added cupholder (woohoo)
94 - more rubber (not a hard DIY mod either)
95 - DBW, Targa top
96 - nothing
97 - 3.2L, 290bhp motor, 6-speed tranny, bigger brakes
98 - nothing
99 - nothing
00 - leather trim interior
01 - nothing
02 - larger exhaust ports, updated suspension, different headlights, wider rear tires, sold only in targa top
03 - nothing
04 - CD changer
05 - nothing


So from 1997 to 2005, there were only 2 major changes (ex. ports and suspension). No wonder by 2005 the car was considered dated. A MY97 with coilovers would do the same thing. Now, if Honda had spent the R&D time updating the NSX during those years, it would still be on sale right now. If you look at the S2000 progression, it's very similar. Major changes in 04, DBW and traction control along with suspension updates in 06, but no power increase, no brake changes, nothing that would make the owner of a MY00 say "I have to have that car." I'm sure the replacements will be amazing cars, and the S2000 and NSX will still be a great car 10 years from now, but I think both Honda and consumers would benefit from serious upgrades to existing chassis.
What about the Brake Upgrades that were introduced, steering changes, and the infamous Zanardi Edition???? I guess those things weren't major, as you could easily do them after eating some McDonald's.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 03:38 PM
  #14  
pgarratt's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,307
Likes: 299
From: Bellefontaine OH
Default

It was their technological showpiece, not the bread winner for honda. If they would have poured millions into updates every year, i doubt they would have sold nearly enough more to make a profit.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2007 | 04:31 PM
  #15  
Mocky's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 105,828
Likes: 152
Default

Originally Posted by Zero Bar,Jun 22 2007, 04:59 PM
I like that, let's hope they stick with something like that design and not that "thing" we saw at Detroit.



that NSX concept car was pretty

I wonder how it is going to compete against the new LF-A...I thought I read somewhere that it was putting down some seriously fast times at the Ring..
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 03:42 AM
  #16  
Popeye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 21,530
Likes: 17
From: Gleening the apex
Default

Originally Posted by toofast4yalll,Aug 11 2007, 10:53 AM
^ Any idea why Honda creates a groundbreaking, technologically advanced car, then does virtually nothing to update it and sells it as-is for 10 years?
Oh mighty oracle of Ohio please enlighten us on your wisdom,bring us out of the dark void and into the light




Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 08:40 AM
  #17  
Scooterboy's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 30,854
Likes: 4,833
From: Medina, OH
Default

Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 09:34 AM
  #18  
ROGUE3308's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,361
Likes: 0
From: Huntington, WV
Default

Originally Posted by Popeye,Oct 1 2007, 06:42 AM
Oh mighty oracle of Ohio please enlighten us on your wisdom,and stop spending all of your time in your boyfriend's dark void.








I read where they are finished with the powerplant testing and have moved on to chasis and body. Looks like several brands are going after the GT type Ferrari. Lexus LF-A, Nissan GTR, Acura. You guys probably can think if a few more.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #19  
pgarratt's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,307
Likes: 299
From: Bellefontaine OH
Default

Aston Martin V8 Vantage

i'll leave the discussions about dark voids to y'all........
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 02:57 AM
  #20  
Popeye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 21,530
Likes: 17
From: Gleening the apex
Default

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mikedaboss2k
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
8
Mar 9, 2012 09:23 PM
jasonjm
Car and Bike Talk
10
Apr 6, 2008 03:01 AM
jasonjm
Car and Bike Talk
20
Jan 15, 2007 11:18 PM
Jason Milner
Car Talk - Non S2000
1
Jan 9, 2007 04:26 AM
Christople
Car and Bike Talk
26
Mar 25, 2006 07:18 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 PM.