Mac gurus: Free image resizer
Originally Posted by FTL,Dec 16 2005, 04:39 PM
I think he's outnumbered (in the pool of people who regularly use both OS's) by those who prefer the Mac.
Originally Posted by FTL,Dec 16 2005, 04:52 PM
True, any pool of combo Mac & PC users is probably made of of people that have to use a PC and choose to use a Mac.
Apple got around this recently with their quad CPU's: Two dual core G5's. If they could only drop them into laptops.
Bummed about the failure of Moore's Law recently... Computes aren't doubling in processing speed every 18 months. PC Centrinos have been stuck betweek 1.4 and 1.8Ghz for a couple years now, as have Mac PowerBooks.
It's also funny, that Microsoft has gone away from Intel (XBox 360), while Apple has done the opposite and is switching to Intel.
apple is also commited to Intel's newly formed NAND Flash company.FYI... I was also told in a recent Q&A session w/ Intel's 5th employee that Steve Jobs approached Gordon Moore to be his Mentor when Apple was being born.
My situation is exactly as FTL lays it out - I spend my own money on Macs and use the PC for work.
I picked up the 17" PB because I envisioned it as a desktop replacement. Never really took it anywhere for business or pleasure except for a few presentations.
The Inspirion 9300 is my company leaser. Being twice the thickness of my PB and considerably heavier I *hate* lugging it around. I even expensed a rolling laptop bag because it is so much of a PITA to carry around.
The screen on it is awesome though and the battery life is better than the AlBook.
I picked up the 17" PB because I envisioned it as a desktop replacement. Never really took it anywhere for business or pleasure except for a few presentations.
The Inspirion 9300 is my company leaser. Being twice the thickness of my PB and considerably heavier I *hate* lugging it around. I even expensed a rolling laptop bag because it is so much of a PITA to carry around.
The screen on it is awesome though and the battery life is better than the AlBook.
right now the 360 has two processors, one for 360 games, another for backwards compatibility. so i've heard thru the Intel grapevine...
I wonder if this is why they bought Connectix (author of Virtual PC, the top Intel emulator for the Mac).
A good buddy of mine works in the XBox group. He told me about the trials and tribulations they went through to get software emulation fast enough to run XBox games reasonably well. This is also why only a subset of XBox games are compatible.
Russ
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah Windows 98
Apple got around this recently with their quad CPU's: Two dual core G5's. If they could only drop them into laptops.
Originally Posted by mwy23,Dec 16 2005, 05:00 PM
Not going to happen.
Originally Posted by RT,Dec 16 2005, 05:14 PM
blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah Windows 98







