Pacific Northwest S2000 Owners For S2000 Owners in Washington, Idaho, and Alaska

POSSIBLE Group Windshield Replacment?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 08:48 AM
  #11  
vtecmom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 111,886
Likes: 2,035
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by 2tirefire,Jan 31 2008, 09:31 AM
Could we possibly combine the dent day with your windshield day? My car has some serious dents that I would like abolished.
PAGING LIGGY MAN PAGING LIGGY MAN

he's our DentdealDUDE
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 08:49 AM
  #12  
vtecmom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 111,886
Likes: 2,035
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by drstrangelove,Jan 31 2008, 09:27 AM
I'm down for that, Toni's window looks like the moon.
Drew that AV ROCKS!
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 09:06 AM
  #13  
bcs's Avatar
bcs
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Default

I for sure need a new windshield, so I would definitely be in for this. Mine happened around Thanksgiving, and I opted to wait because of the holidays. Now I need to replace it.

So yea...if this gets going, I will be there for sure!











Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 09:20 AM
  #14  
tukluc's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland
Default

I'm game (pending final price as mine is OK but pretty badly pitted + few chips!)

Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 10:08 AM
  #15  
124Spider's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, Washington, USA
Default

My S2000 is on at least its fifth windshield, but this one is ok so far. But we have two other cars with cracked windshields. Would this just be an S2000 thing?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 10:10 AM
  #16  
vtecmom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 111,886
Likes: 2,035
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by bcs,Jan 31 2008, 10:06 AM
I for sure need a new windshield, so I would definitely be in for this. Mine happened around Thanksgiving, and I opted to wait because of the holidays. Now I need to replace it.

So yea...if this gets going, I will be there for sure!








@ that pic

I thought about takin a pic of my crack butt figured it might jinx it and make it spread even faster
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 10:12 AM
  #17  
vtecmom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 111,886
Likes: 2,035
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by 124Spider,Jan 31 2008, 11:08 AM
My S2000 is on at least its fifth windshield, but this one is ok so far. But we have two other cars with cracked windshields. Would this just be an S2000 thing?
Possibly and I will get the answer to that ? soon!
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #18  
S2KANDNSX's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 353
Likes: 1
Default

I also need a new windshield let me know

John in portland
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #19  
drstrangelove's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=vtecmom,Jan 31 2008, 09:49 AM] Drew that AV ROCKS!
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #20  
vtecmom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 111,886
Likes: 2,035
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by drstrangelove,Jan 31 2008, 11:22 AM
It's a picture of a nuclear bomb test called MET that was part of the Teapot test series in 1955.

Test: MET
Time: 19:15 15 April 1955 (GMT)
11:15 15 April 1955 (PST)
Location: Nevada Test Site (NTS), Frenchman Flats
Test Height and Type: 400 Foot Tower Shot
Yield: 22 kt


MET stands either for "Military Effects Test" or "Military Effects Tower" (according to Frank Shelton). This was a LASL test of a composite U-233/plutonium bomb core (the first test by the U.S. to use U-233) in a Mk 7 HE assembly. The 30 inch diameter spherical implosion system weighed 800 lb.

The primary purpose was to evaluate the destructive effects of nuclear explosions for military purposes. For this reason, the DOD specified that a device must be used that had a yield calibrated to within +/- 10%, and the Buster Easy device design was selected (this test gave 31 kt and used a plutonium/U-235 core). LASL weapon designers however decided to conduct a weapon design experiment with this shot, and unbeknownst to the test effect personnel substituted the untried U-233 core. The predicted yield was 33 kt. The actual 22 kt was 33% below this, seriously compromising the data collected.

Had enough??
no I wanna hear more


and could you tell me how to not be afraid of turbulance your bein a pilot and all I've had pilots try before butt I'm still not a fan of it

PS howz our girl doin??
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:23 AM.