Photography and Videography Tips, techniques and equipment for taking great photographs and videos. Come here for advice and critique on your photos and videos. To show off your S2000 go to The Gallery

Dumb n00b question

 
Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 06:52 AM
  #1  
Dan Hale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,306
Likes: 0
From: On the back wheel. . .
Thumbs up Dumb n00b question

Hi all,

The girlfriend and I bought ourselves a Canon EOS400D for Christmas, and I have finally got round to downloading some pictures to my pc.

All the pictures are RAW - and now I guess I need to process them?

But how?

What do I do to them?

I could read the manual in detail, but I'm sure you all will be able to put it in to layman's terms for me.

At present all I have is the software that came with the camera . . .

Please help!

TIA
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 07:02 AM
  #2  
hyb's Avatar
hyb
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
From: Dorset/Somerset
Default

RAW is the uncompressed data. The software that comes with the Camera should be able to view them, edit and export them to a normal jpeg photo. Or if you have Photoshop or I think Picasa (googles photo management software) will do RAW as well.

You can change what your camera saves to in the menu, if you don't want to lots of editing you may as well just set it to the highest JPEG setting, easier to manage and you can get a lot more to a memory card.

But as for getting to you pics, install what came with the camera and plug in the USB, should just work!
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 07:08 AM
  #3  
Dan Hale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,306
Likes: 0
From: On the back wheel. . .
Default

I have them on the pc - I'm just wondering more if I need to edit them at all or just re-save now as jpeg's?

If editing then what should I do?
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 07:38 AM
  #4  
hyb's Avatar
hyb
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
From: Dorset/Somerset
Default

You don't have to edit them at all if your happy with them. Things like adjusting the exposure is quite useful with a RAW photo. I'm sure there will be someone along that uses RAW more then me to explain what you can do with them a bit better
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #5  
F1-Fanatic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,242
Likes: 0
From: Branford, CT
Default

Originally Posted by hyb,Feb 14 2007, 11:38 AM
You don't have to edit them at all if your happy with them. Things like adjusting the exposure is quite useful with a RAW photo. I'm sure there will be someone along that uses RAW more then me to explain what you can do with them a bit better
No disrespect intended, but this is simply not true... RAW images need to be edited unless the photographer is Ray Charles. There is no sharpening, color saturation, white balance, or anything else done that is normally done "in camera" when shooting Jpegs. It is this reason that photographers choose to shoot RAW, because it places the creative decisions in the hands of the photographer and not the camera. If the images were to be left "as is" they would most likely be flat and have no punch at all.
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #6  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

[QUOTE=F1-Fanatic,Feb 14 2007, 02:57 PM] No disrespect intended, but this is simply not true...
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #7  
Dan Hale's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,306
Likes: 0
From: On the back wheel. . .
Default

In the meantime then, would I be better shooting in jpeg - then go back to RAW later?

Trending Topics

Old Feb 14, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #8  
Kiteland's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,423
Likes: 1
From: Flying
Default

probably
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #9  
Liebernoodle's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 0
From: Tree Town
Default

Originally Posted by NFRs2000NYC,Feb 14 2007, 03:14 PM
Here is a PERFECT example (noodle, hope you dont mind Im using your awesome pics for a comparison)
I am flattered that you tagged my name on that great photo, but I believe it belongs to Ketchup

And yes, I recommend going back to JPEG until you get comfortable with the camera. Learn how to use the camera first, then you can worry about RAW processing to get the best out of your camera you just learned
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 02:31 PM
  #10  
brucek2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: Irvine
Default

Originally Posted by NFRs2000NYC,Feb 14 2007, 12:14 PM


Here is a PERFECT example (noodle, hope you dont mind Im using your awesome pics for a comparison)

RAW:



This is a RAW pic without any editing. Looks ok at best. Sure you can save it, print it, and call it a day, but why? The point of having a camera like a 400D is to get every ounce of photo quality/beauty possible.

After post editing, you picture will come out like this....

JPEG edited:



The difference is uncomparable.

Get photoshop, learn a bit of it, and youll be on your way to great photography. RAW format is made to be edited.
how the heck did u do that? can you post a step-by-step guide.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:43 AM.