Photography and Videography Tips, techniques and equipment for taking great photographs and videos. Come here for advice and critique on your photos and videos. To show off your S2000 go to The Gallery

How is it so sharp...

 
Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 9, 2009 | 07:46 PM
  #21  
vincewchan's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 1
From: Los angeles
Default

boobs........ say what?
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 04:43 AM
  #22  
bluextc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: Reston, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Picturepro,Feb 9 2009, 07:04 PM
I agree with Red: catch lights are a mess, but that is the only detail. otherwise it might look like a painting and over processed.


I think you have your blue and red mixed.


yea there is no way of telling what gear was used and who cares when the model is showing us so much more.
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 05:15 AM
  #23  
Spanky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu/Kona,HI
Default

The photos above have some amazing details!!!

Here's a photo I came across when researching a 70-200mm SSM G that amazed me with it's sharpness. (Taken from Dyxum.com)


(Click on photo for full resolution)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3342/322283...6175be0ac_o.jpg
Shot with Sony a900, 70-200mm SSM G @ 105mm, f/8, 1/250s, ISO160

(I ended up buying this lens! )
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #24  
Picturepro's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,143
Likes: 2
From: 949
Default

Bluextc: sorry, sn mixed up


Spanky: thats a great lens, now hook us up with some of those Hawaiian sunsets

Thanks for everyones input
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 01:37 PM
  #25  
LazyProfessor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
From: Groton, Connecticut
Default

I thought it was faux pas to have your reflection shown in your subject...



Old Feb 10, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #26  
AssassinJN's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,802
Likes: 5
Default

The amount of information in the reflection of that guys eye still impresses me.
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 06:24 PM
  #27  
RED MX5's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,087
Likes: 2
From: Dry Branch
Default

I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that I can't judge the detail that is resolved in a given image by looking at it on an electronic display. I'd try printing some of the images that have been posted, but I don't know the source colorspace. Anyone got any hints or tips?
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 04:01 AM
  #28  
AssassinJN's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,802
Likes: 5
Default

That is very true, and made me think more about it.

Consider that the resolution of the image above (1786px
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 09:35 PM
  #29  
highwaystardoritos's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,199
Likes: 14
From: Melbourne, FL
Default

belongs in the hottie's section
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 10:36 PM
  #30  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by RED MX5,Feb 9 2009, 08:35 PM
My gut feel is that you are absolutely correct, but I guess I need convincing.

I cheaped out on the D300 because $10k plus was just too much to spend on equipment that I wasn't fully convinced would meet or exceed my highest expectations (lol, lack of talent aside, I still appreciate fine prints and enjoy giving it my best shot). Any good examples that might help push me over the edge of indecision?
The problem is, you wont be able to tell on a monitor. You can only conclude if you see an actual large print. The image posted above could have easily come out of a 1Ds or a 5DII. We need to see a large print to really have a concrete conclusion.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:33 PM.