Photography and Videography Tips, techniques and equipment for taking great photographs and videos. Come here for advice and critique on your photos and videos. To show off your S2000 go to The Gallery

noise at iso 100 on 30d

 
Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 04:39 AM
  #1  
CarbonS2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default noise at iso 100 on 30d

Im used a 17-85 is lens on my 30d at iso 100 for a 30 second exposure. Why am I still getting noise? you can see it in the water and the sky. I tried using noise reduction in the pull down in photoshop but still get the noise. Thanx for the help.



Old Jul 18, 2007 | 07:18 AM
  #2  
iLuveketchup's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,907
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Default

Did you raise the exposure, levels, curves, or any other setting?
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 07:25 AM
  #3  
CarbonS2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

raised exposure 1/2 a stop
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 07:25 AM
  #4  
GT_2003's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Default

30 second exposure is the culprit here, I believe. With high ISO's, the system is effectively turning up the gain, so you get more noise. With lower ISO's on long exposures, you are storing the sensor output over a longer period of time, so any noise at all gets captured. Consider it like taking all the noise from a hundred 100ISO images and putting it all into one.

You might experiment with shutter speeds to find a sweet spot with lower noise but enough exposure. Or use a larger aperture.
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 07:26 AM
  #5  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

That 30 second exposure might just be too long for your sensor.
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 07:45 AM
  #6  
jtpassat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,890
Likes: 0
Default

there is a "custom function" that allows for long exposure noise compensation. look it up on your manual.
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 07:57 AM
  #7  
jtpassat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,890
Likes: 0
Default

ok.. waiting for lunch to come around here you go

http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/30d...-functions.htm
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 08:18 AM
  #8  
iLuveketchup's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,907
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonS2000,Jul 18 2007, 07:25 AM
raised exposure 1/2 a stop
1/2 stop bump in exposure is a lot when capturing very low light levels. You're basically bumping pixels that aren't there.
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #9  
CarbonS2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

what if i bumped the iso to 500 and use a shorter exposure? would i get a better photo with less noise?
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 09:05 AM
  #10  
jtpassat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,890
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonS2000,Jul 18 2007, 11:25 AM
what if i bumped the iso to 500 and use a shorter exposure? would i get a better photo with less noise?
your best bet is to always use the lowest ISO possible, smallest aperture and long exposure AND the long exposure noise reduction function on the camera.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 PM.