Please CC
Your detail shots were mostly good. The tail shot is poor because it has so many reflections and you don't clearly define the tail light itself. Your engine shots were mostly good. The profile shots of the car typically had a busy background or were cocked at an angle, which only works some of the time (some would argue none of the time). You really need to watch what reflections you want on the car. A neat location with bad reflections will mean you get a bad picture most of the time.
The interior, engine valve cover, start button, and wheel shots were nicly done.
The interior, engine valve cover, start button, and wheel shots were nicly done.
That's actually quite funny because my friends are jumping in the tailight picture haha t_t. Anyway yeah I didn't notice the foot there and I will definitely watch my reflections next time!
On another note... I've always wanted to do rolling shots but can never produe a good and clear picture. What speed do I need to shoot at? I do not have a rolling shot rig for clarification.
I will try to update a few pics in a week or two with less distracting backgrounds
On another note... I've always wanted to do rolling shots but can never produe a good and clear picture. What speed do I need to shoot at? I do not have a rolling shot rig for clarification.
I will try to update a few pics in a week or two with less distracting backgrounds
Do I spy waterspots in the photo of the S2000 badge? And the lighting in the first photo seems a bit dark, but that may be intentional?
Everything has already been mentioned. Foot. Reflections. Etc.
Great photos overall!
Everything has already been mentioned. Foot. Reflections. Etc.
Great photos overall!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



















