S2000 Electronics Information and discussion related to S2000 electronics such as ICE, GPS, and alarms.

Which amp for the power?

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 03:18 PM
  #11  
darkknight1999's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,288
Likes: 0
From: Hopedale, MA
Default

So I guess I wasn't completely wrong. Just 'My' discription was just off.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 03:19 PM
  #12  
s2krazy01's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 970
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Looneybomber,Feb 20 2007, 01:52 PM
The pioneer 7800 has a 16chan EQ if that matters to you. It will help contour your sound, reduce the resonating peaks ect. It also accepts a wired DCI and has 24bit DAC's. Check that one out too if you're looking for a HU.
I checked out the HU, it looks like a great product. I found it for about $50 more than I could find the Alpine 9857, but I wouldn't mind paying that for a better display and equalizer (although I cannot find the stats on the Alpine eq.). However, the CD signal-to-noise ratio is 11dB less than the 9857. Would I be able to hear the difference?
Otherwise, the only thing holding me back is that while on the Alpine website, I noticed the soon-to-be released iDA-X001. It comes with a built-in USB adapter and a 2.2" LCD. The specs have not yet been posted.

After hours of research, I have found that Pioneer makes amps with the same power output as Alpine for much less $$$ (PRS-D2100T and GM-5300T). However, there are differences in other areas like 'crossover frequency' and many other categories which I have no knowledge of. Can someone please let me know in a nutshell if the Alpine is worth the extra cash or is this a brand name markup?

In short, the initial setup I was considering was the Alpine 9883, Alpine 2.150, and Infinity Perfect 6.1's. Now I'm considering using the Pioneer 7800 and PRS-D2100T/GM-5300T. Feedback please.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 04:58 PM
  #13  
oth's Avatar
oth
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 62
From: NJ USA
Default

historically, class D amps distorted at higher frequencies, and were
only acceptable as subwoofer amps. most are still like this, but
recently a few companies have introduced "full range" class D amps
that have solved this problem, and the Alpine PDX is one of those.
They are relatively expensive, though. They're worth it if you want
the small size/efficiency/cool running, but there are cheaper amps
that will sound at least as good. I know nothing about the Pioneers
specifically, though.
if you're interested in class D in depth, here's a link...
http://sound.westhost.com/articles/pwm.htm
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 07:53 PM
  #14  
Aze85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,000
Likes: 0
From: No.VA
Default

so, since class D amps are good for subs, how would the Alpine PDX 2-150 do paired with the infinity kappa perfect 6.1's?
would they sound crappy? also, the head unit is a alpine cda 9835
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 07:56 PM
  #15  
darkknight1999's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,288
Likes: 0
From: Hopedale, MA
Default

The PDX amps have truly amazing power routing and control. They are great for just about everything
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2007 | 08:35 PM
  #16  
Aze85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,000
Likes: 0
From: No.VA
Default

^^ thanks. that is good to hear. mine just arrived last week. now i am waiting for the perfects
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2007 | 06:35 AM
  #17  
s2krazy01's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 970
Likes: 2
Default

Would someone knowledgeable please compare these and let me know which is overall better (and why). Notice the crossover frequencies and frequency responses, not to mention the bridged power outputs and S/N.

Pioneer Premier PRS-D2100T

Alpine PDX-2.150
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 12:41 AM
  #18  
Looneybomber's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Topeka, KS
Default

For a S/N ratio, anything over 96db is just fine in your car, for bragging rights, you can try to get all of your home theater (HT) equipment over 110db, because of the DVD's dynamic range, but your ears might only hear the difference between 100 and 115 in a dead sound room because houses typically have more ambient noise than your HT system.

For CD audio, a S/N ratio over 96db is superfulous since CD's have a dynamic range of 96db http://georgegraham.com/compress.html.
In other words it's like hooking up a fire hose to the water faucet on your house. Just because the larger hose can flow more water, doesn't mean the source can provide more water.
To further make it rediculous, when you're driving down the freeway in your S, the level of noise in the cabin might be around 80db, MUCH louder than any noise in a crappy audio system! You could damn near use a record player as your headunit and still not hear the noise/distortion.

To recap, you will hear more noise from the recording on the disk than you will from your entire system, even with a S/N ratio of 100db from the HU.

*edit*
More good reading about digital audio and an explanation of what S/N ratio is towards the bottom. Upon looking at the graph, you will see why anything above 96db for a CD player is just not needed and strictly for bragging rights.
http://www.teamcombooks.com/mp3handbook/11.htm
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 03:54 AM
  #19  
Balthazar_B's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=s2krazy01,Feb 19 2007, 07:12 PM] Does the power output of the HU matter if you're going to run an amp anyway?
Say I'm buying components rated at 300W (110W RMS) and 4 ohms.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #20  
s2krazy01's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 970
Likes: 2
Default

For CD audio, a S/N ratio over 96db is superfulous since CD's have a dynamic range of 96db
That's really interesting and helpful information. Thanks

[QUOTE]You have lots of amp choices.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:02 PM.