3.0L turbo S2K
Banned
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by AirborneS2K,Jul 23 2007, 06:25 PM
How is this power going to be useable? Our wheelbase isn't big enough to efficiently handle 800-1000whp unlike that of say supras or other longer,wider cars....I know how everyone drools over 2jz S2000s, but I see it as a waste and a display of how unneccesary and unuseable excess is the new wave.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
That looks really familiar. 
Here is the one I finished. Good Luck with your build.
Video 1
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/98a2422...92b0005b828.htm
Video 2
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/e719f25...92b016baa3e.htm
Video 3
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/b5bd153...92b016cb940.htm
Video 4
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/0fff2ac...92b000993e5.htm
Here is the one I finished. Good Luck with your build.
Video 1
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/98a2422...92b0005b828.htm
Video 2
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/e719f25...92b016baa3e.htm
Video 3
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/b5bd153...92b016cb940.htm
Video 4
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/0fff2ac...92b000993e5.htm
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,386
Likes: 107
From: Right Here.
Umm......yea i guess that sounds silly.......but what i meant was.......
You know how you have a NA S2k? aannnnnd people put a bolt on turbo kit/sc kit on them? they are NA engines with a turbo/sc kit......
So what i was getting at was........* since they DO have NA supra's and Twin turbo Supras* was that, did he put the twin turbo motor in the S2k? or did he swap the NA supra engine and PUT a turbo kit on it?
Because i'm sure theres a significant cost difference in a na motor vs the Twin turbo....I say NA with single because i read in there that there was a SINGLE turbo.
So the the third option would be to have a Twin turbo motor from a supra.....and just delete the twin turbos and put just a single turbo on it.
If that was too confusing...i appologize.
You know how you have a NA S2k? aannnnnd people put a bolt on turbo kit/sc kit on them? they are NA engines with a turbo/sc kit......
So what i was getting at was........* since they DO have NA supra's and Twin turbo Supras* was that, did he put the twin turbo motor in the S2k? or did he swap the NA supra engine and PUT a turbo kit on it?
Because i'm sure theres a significant cost difference in a na motor vs the Twin turbo....I say NA with single because i read in there that there was a SINGLE turbo.
So the the third option would be to have a Twin turbo motor from a supra.....and just delete the twin turbos and put just a single turbo on it.
If that was too confusing...i appologize.
Banned
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by AirborneS2K,Jul 24 2007, 08:31 AM
Why would I have to know about a build other than its a fully built 3.4L 2jz gte single turbo motor on an s2000 with flared out fenders er.. excuse me, 'widebody' to know that power levels seen on a fully built 3.4L single turbo 2jz engine will be ridiculously difficult if not impossible to be EFFECTIVELY put to the ground?
Don't be a dumbass that jumps on the bandwagon just b/c it is 'different'. Which reminds me, I can put an LS7 in my s2k, and be different, does that mean I'm awesome innovative and all that bullshit?
Power is worthless if you can't transfer it effectively to the ground. When the owner or any 2JZ powered S2k owner shows me a video of him putting 700whp down without slicks for those daily driven or non tracked 2jz'd s2000s, then I'll be impressed or say 'good job, you did it right, great build' or when I see a 2jz'd s2000 thats meant for drag that has slicks and runs 9's , I will again say 'good job, a purpose built s2000 that is not as common', til then, whats the point? Oh, thats right, you're 'different'.
Another note: I don't give a shit who I offend when saying that a lot of you S2K owners think that excess is the sh*t now adays, excess in spending ridiculous $$ on worthless parts just to say you did or throwing gobs of $$ on a car that produces 900whp that you drive daily and have to go 1/2 throttle on b/c you get sideways everytime you punch it...the point is, I don't know why you guys think that just b/c big numbers and big money go into something that is NOT different, just not done as much, equates to having a 'wow' factor when its not functional.
To any assholes that will continue to flame this and turn this into a me personally bashing the GUY the made this post, the previous statements are obviously my own opinion on how dumping other big ass motors into our SMALL car and making ridiculous power that will never be useable on the street, since I have yet to see a TRACKED 2jz'd S2000, is stupid and not functional in the real world, only a dyno and forum dwellers. I am not personally attacking anyone, I am stomping the idea of 'being different' at the price of not being functional. Whoop tee doo I lifted my s2000, put a hemi in it, and put some swampers on it! REVOLUTIONARY!!!!
Get off the bandwagon already, I am entitled to my opinion just as you are to yours, so don't expect to talk shit to me without deserving any right back.
Don't be a dumbass that jumps on the bandwagon just b/c it is 'different'. Which reminds me, I can put an LS7 in my s2k, and be different, does that mean I'm awesome innovative and all that bullshit?
Power is worthless if you can't transfer it effectively to the ground. When the owner or any 2JZ powered S2k owner shows me a video of him putting 700whp down without slicks for those daily driven or non tracked 2jz'd s2000s, then I'll be impressed or say 'good job, you did it right, great build' or when I see a 2jz'd s2000 thats meant for drag that has slicks and runs 9's , I will again say 'good job, a purpose built s2000 that is not as common', til then, whats the point? Oh, thats right, you're 'different'.
Another note: I don't give a shit who I offend when saying that a lot of you S2K owners think that excess is the sh*t now adays, excess in spending ridiculous $$ on worthless parts just to say you did or throwing gobs of $$ on a car that produces 900whp that you drive daily and have to go 1/2 throttle on b/c you get sideways everytime you punch it...the point is, I don't know why you guys think that just b/c big numbers and big money go into something that is NOT different, just not done as much, equates to having a 'wow' factor when its not functional.
To any assholes that will continue to flame this and turn this into a me personally bashing the GUY the made this post, the previous statements are obviously my own opinion on how dumping other big ass motors into our SMALL car and making ridiculous power that will never be useable on the street, since I have yet to see a TRACKED 2jz'd S2000, is stupid and not functional in the real world, only a dyno and forum dwellers. I am not personally attacking anyone, I am stomping the idea of 'being different' at the price of not being functional. Whoop tee doo I lifted my s2000, put a hemi in it, and put some swampers on it! REVOLUTIONARY!!!!
Get off the bandwagon already, I am entitled to my opinion just as you are to yours, so don't expect to talk shit to me without deserving any right back.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,386
Likes: 107
From: Right Here.
sooooooooo..............Asura.......that was a Fully built 3.4L motor with a single turbo.............Gotcha!
OH and Airborne.......were you or are in the army? just wanted to let you know........THAT FRICKIN PIC OF YOURS IS A REAL TURN ON MAN! hahahaha.......
OH and Airborne.......were you or are in the army? just wanted to let you know........THAT FRICKIN PIC OF YOURS IS A REAL TURN ON MAN! hahahaha.......