S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

90mm bore and boost

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #1  
juntuned's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 1
From: West Las Vegas
Default 90mm bore and boost

I REALLY would love to sleeve at 90 but obviously reliability goes south. Anyone having any luck on a 90mm block with boost? what engine builder did you use?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #2  
ERL_S2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Default

1. Past 89mm you can not o-ring the head and you will run into major issues with gaskets because of the big bore size. Sealing area becomes very small. This is not a big problem with N/A engines but being FI we have very little room to work. I am using a OEM gasket @ 89.5mm. The thickness is .030". Given your deck height after your new setup is install and how much comes off the head if you have it reworked ect ect ect may require you to modify the piston spec before installation do to having a limited amount of gaskets to use. I personally did not want to use cometic in any way esp @ that bore size. I see nothing wrong with a 88mm bore.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 09:31 PM
  #3  
m R g S r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
From: Westchester NY
Default

start with a small bore, that way if something gets f'ed up, you don't need new sleeves because you were already at the bore limit.

And it's not like the 1mm makes a big difference, if any at all, in power.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 09:51 AM
  #4  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by m R g S r,Aug 27 2009, 01:31 AM
start with a small bore, that way if something gets f'ed up, you don't need new sleeves because you were already at the bore limit.

And it's not like the 1mm makes a big difference, if any at all, in power.
x2

87mm FTW.

upp the boost for more power
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 10:54 AM
  #5  
S2oooNvegas's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
Default

How come when one person advises correctly, some people have to ask 500 others to get the same answer?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #6  
MaseEngineering's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville
Default

factory bore 9:1 compression.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 11:39 AM
  #7  
305s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl
Default

^^^ I would listen to Mase
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 27, 2009 | 11:50 AM
  #8  
S2oooNvegas's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
Default

9 to 1? why so low? Not with vtec, maybe in an engine with a fixed cam profile. Mase' thoughts on dynamic compression.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #9  
ERL_S2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Default

If you need any more info just PM me again. Good luck.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 11:48 AM
  #10  
HiVolume's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Qc
Default

Originally Posted by juntuned,Aug 26 2009, 07:50 PM
I REALLY would love to sleeve at 90 but obviously reliability goes south. Anyone having any luck on a 90mm block with boost? what engine builder did you use?
How many run 90mm on a boosted application? Any recommendations/pitfalls that could be shared? (except for comments relating to NOT using 90mm...)
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:49 PM.