S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Adding more injectors

Old Jun 4, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #1  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default Adding more injectors

I'm new to SC tuning and was wondering some things about fuel management specific to injectors for a particular application. I have seen some set ups where adding another injector in the fuel rail or possibly a new fuel rail/manifold for an additional stock injector per cylinder, does this allow you somehow to get around the need for a stand alone ecu? Will this give you the needed extra fuel wile still utilizing the factory fuel management? Is this why this is done versus a bigger cc injector? Thanks for any insight...
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #2  
Enthralled's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

the stock injectors will hold up to 7psi without upgrading anything.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #3  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by Enthralled,Jun 4 2008, 09:52 PM
the stock injectors will hold up to 7psi without upgrading anything.
I'm aware of this thanks. Can you answer my questions on the multi injectors when running say more then 7psi? Am I right in my assumption or does it not work this way?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 07:03 AM
  #4  
ChefJ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 3
From: Braselton, GA
Default

It would be more cost effective to go with a piggy-back and increase injector size as opposed to tapping and rigging up new injectors.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 07:09 AM
  #5  
rob!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Default

if you simply add more fuel injectors to the factory ecu with nothing to control them just splice them from the original wires you are going to be running super rich all the time. In otherwords you are going to be getting double the amount of fuel. Not sure how unfamiliar you are about fuel managment. But the only time you need more fuel for forced induction is when you go into boost. If you simply added injectors to your setup you would have extra fuel all the time. Your assumption is wrong. It does not work this way. That is why everyone runs a piggy back or stand alone with larger volume injectors.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #6  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by rob!,Jun 5 2008, 07:09 AM
if you simply add more fuel injectors to the factory ecu with nothing to control them just splice them from the original wires you are going to be running super rich all the time. In otherwords you are going to be getting double the amount of fuel. Not sure how unfamiliar you are about fuel managment. But the only time you need more fuel for forced induction is when you go into boost. If you simply added injectors to your setup you would have extra fuel all the time. Your assumption is wrong. It does not work this way. That is why everyone runs a piggy back or stand alone with larger volume injectors.
Ok this makes sense, so to me a piggy back would seem to be the affordable and more simple aproach vs a stand alone and then tuning it, since I am only comfortable dealing with piggy backs. I was not aware there was one for just injector management. Does it work with SC? or are these usually just Turbo spisific? I am currently using a VAFC so is it safe to assume I cannot use another piggy back for injector management in junction with this? Reliablity and consistancy is important to me as well as cost and ease of programming changes on the fly if needed, one reason why I like the VAFC so much.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 10:11 AM
  #7  
rob!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Default

the computer doesnt know if you are NA, supercharged or turbo charged. so it would work with a supercharger. A piggyback i was referring to would be the greddy unit which most people use. VAFC is not the safest way to manage your fuel. Sure people use it, and yes, people blow their engines. I suggest something else though because the s2000 engine is not cheap.

Me personally use a full standalone (aem) because i want it to be as safe as possible. There is many guys getting by on a piggy back though. goodluck. keep researching before you try anything. There is a lot to know to go along with FI
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jun 5, 2008 | 10:25 AM
  #8  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

Originally Posted by rob!,Jun 5 2008, 10:11 AM
the computer doesnt know if you are NA, supercharged or turbo charged. so it would work with a supercharger. A piggyback i was referring to would be the greddy unit which most people use. VAFC is not the safest way to manage your fuel. Sure people use it, and yes, people blow their engines. I suggest something else though because the s2000 engine is not cheap.

Me personally use a full standalone (aem) because i want it to be as safe as possible. There is many guys getting by on a piggy back though. goodluck. keep researching before you try anything. There is a lot to know to go along with FI
I agree the VAFC is not ideal or totally consistant, thats why I rely on my wide band for keeping my car in tune, it works great if you know where you are at all times. Stand alone is going to fluctuate with the weather as well though is it not? The thing I like about piggy backs is you can make quick on the spot adjustmentes, even wile driving. Cant do this with a stand alone. So my question was can you run a injector piggy back unit like the greddy wile also utilizing the vafc at the same time, or does the greddy unit take the place of the vafc now so it is no longer needed for fuel corrections? I don't know how the greddy manages the fuel injectors. Thanks for your input man.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #9  
rob!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Default

greddy would take over the job... but why should you have to make on the fly corrections? esp while driving? i got my car tuned once and never have to touch it. I have a wideband i never look at really. whether it is 0 degrees or 100 degrees (NJ weather) i dont have to touch anything. It has o2 feedback built in.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #10  
devs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky,Jun 5 2008, 01:45 AM
I'm new to SC tuning and was wondering some things about fuel management specific to injectors for a particular application. I have seen some set ups where adding another injector in the fuel rail or possibly a new fuel rail/manifold for an additional stock injector per cylinder, does this allow you somehow to get around the need for a stand alone ecu? Will this give you the needed extra fuel wile still utilizing the factory fuel management? Is this why this is done versus a bigger cc injector? Thanks for any insight...

My tuner and his shop (Scott of Ballistic Motorsports and Giles of Holyroller Dyno both in Bow, NH) used a secondary fuel rail on a comptech kit with a smaller pulley and the greddy emanage ultimate was used for management. You can still simply use larger injectors instead of having two fuel rails, but my tuner was explaining that there are certain benefits to using the two fuel rails with stock injectors as opposed to a single fuel rail with large injectors.

3. ) Why is this better than larger injectors ...

A.)To Idle a larger injector means you have to get the pulse width to a minimum . The problem with that is you will reach a point where the injector is either on or off . You will never get it to go low enough to idle without running rich . So you get poor idle and poor fuel economy and misfire ( Even if you run a standalone ) . The secondary system can be use with Greddy or even the AEM standalone and have its benefits . ( I did send some parts to some members highly respected in the FI community of this site and they will be using it with the AEM, and one reason is because of the poor ability to idle large injectors . While you might not see the difference between the rail and 550cc injectors you will when you step up to 750cc plus .

B. ) When saying it is a E-manage only problem , that is not true . It is a Problem with any standalone also . The difference is with the Greddy the Factory ECU tells you you are misfiring , while the AEM will not and people learn to live with it . ( My Miata misfires and the motor is bone stock, but it is pre OBDII and it does not care ) Why you ask , well AEM does not worry about OBDII as it was designed for race use only, and the cars dont sit at idle long . But did you know even the AEM drag cars run secondary injection ??? Ahhhhh lots of race cars do smile.gif Even in F1 wink.gif
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RAIN H8R
S2000 Forced Induction
37
Jan 23, 2012 09:29 AM
TerminatioN
S2000 Forced Induction
18
Jun 16, 2011 12:19 PM
Rodion
S2000 Under The Hood
7
Feb 23, 2004 04:36 PM



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:54 PM.