S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Comptech SC dyno graph vs stock.

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 05:48 PM
  #1  
Gruppe-S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 14
From: Santa Ana, Ca 92701
Default Comptech SC dyno graph vs stock.

Hey guys,

We just supercharged a stock 2001 S2K with a Comptech SC w/AC.

Here is the Dyno comparsion. Please keep in mind we have a 4wd Mustang Dyno that read really low. 99% of the S2K on this dyno makes around 180-190 stock or slighty modded.



Thanks,
Tom
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005 | 10:20 PM
  #2  
Aze85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,000
Likes: 0
From: No.VA
Default

graph looks smooth. no pre-vtec dip.
i knew mustang dyones read lower, but damn... that is low
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #3  
Halo's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Default

(256-187)/187 = 0.37

37% gain is in right in the ballpark for most people that bolt up the CT SC. The raw numbers are dyno dependent, conditions dependent of course. Did you guys run an A/F?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 11:02 PM
  #4  
kstokell's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Den Haag
Default

It looks about right to me I got a 42% increase with my Vortech kit.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 03:58 PM
  #5  
S2000 Cabrio's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
From: ALWAYSRAINING,WA
Default

That's pretty normal for Comptech FI. I just got mine dynoed two months ago from a Mustang dyno just similar as yours and I got 271 with Vortech SC though.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 04:10 PM
  #6  
Silver S2k4's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,206
Likes: 0
Default

i dunno guys, I made like 285 and dynoed at 187 stock.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 07:28 AM
  #7  
slimjim8201's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Gie
Default

These results look low. Definitely the most conservative dyno results I've seen for a SC application.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Nov 4, 2005 | 04:37 PM
  #8  
Gruppe-S's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 14
From: Santa Ana, Ca 92701
Default

Ya, our dyno is def a heartbreaker.

Tom
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 08:00 PM
  #9  
gary_phd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Hey Tom,

That looks about right. My car on your dyno around 256whp, but had 168wtq (that's about 14 wtq more than your 01). On Modacar's Dynojet, I dynoed at 289whp and 188wtq.

Here's my dyno from your dyno day.

Reply
Old Nov 5, 2005 | 09:31 AM
  #10  
Halo's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Default

Thanks for posting that gary_phd. 33 hp difference between 2 dynos on 2 different days!

Tom, people hopefullly understand that these numbers are not that useful in an absolute sense. Otherwise, they're just out for bragging rights anyway. (In that case, you can tell them that the 'correction' factor between the whp measured on you dyno and crank hp is 140% So, they're making m4d p0w4 anyway
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:19 AM.