S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Comptech SC or RevHard Turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:33 PM
  #21  
S2KOZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

thanks quick question im looking at vortech s/c or comptech s/c which will be better i also have my 4.57 gears which should be good for s/c right? or should i go boost?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #22  
John_Z's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 1
From: Vortech Central
Default

Boost is always better The 4.57s compliment any FI setup. There is a thread that compares the two SCs. You can't go wrong with either.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #23  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

You really should do a search. The whole Comptech vs. Vortech thing has been done to death.

Gears would be fine.

What do you mean "or should i go boost?"? Isn't that what we're talking about?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 03:02 PM
  #24  
S2KOZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

well everywhere i go i hear turbo then i hear s/c the only thing ive heard that convices me is that s/c your s2000 doesnt bring that many problems to your engine rather than go turbo? thats what i meant by "or should i go boost"
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 03:08 PM
  #25  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

I'm confused. SC is "boost" too. Do you mean "Should I stay NA?".

My advice is that you should do a lot of searching and a lot of reading in this forum before you go any further. Everything you want to know has been posted and is just waiting for you to find it.

Once you have exhausted all your enquiries you can then make a decision about which way to go.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #26  
NSRsinfuLangeL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
From: w/teh POKEMON
Default

tons of power, tuning required = turbo

good amount of power, plug and play fuel set up with reliability = sc
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 04:04 PM
  #27  
John_Z's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 1
From: Vortech Central
Default

Originally Posted by stitos2k,Jan 25 2006, 01:10 PM
You might also want to ask yourself about emissions laws in your state. SC is is 50 state legal, turbo isn't.
This was the #1 reason I went SC.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 05:28 PM
  #28  
ex-eclipse's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by AusS2000,Jan 26 2006, 07:08 PM
I'm confused. SC is "boost" too. Do you mean "Should I stay NA?".

My advice is that you should do a lot of searching and a lot of reading in this forum before you go any further. Everything you want to know has been posted and is just waiting for you to find it.

Once you have exhausted all your enquiries you can then make a decision about which way to go.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #29  
Quivers's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 0
Default

Please tell us your situation, like Money, concerns, ultimate goal. then we can further help. At this point all we know is that you want to go faster.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 07:50 AM
  #30  
silverstwok's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Default

I have the Rev Hard kit and the guys that installed it said it was one of the best kits they have ever seen, they really liked it. Like everyone else has told you make sure you get it tuned. If possible get yourself the AEM stand alone engine management system, it will give you a good piece of mind in the end (by helping you to not blow you engine.) It also give you the performance you are looking for with a turbo. Definitely go with teh Rev Hard.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:15 AM.