S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Which GM Map Sensor?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-07-2008, 05:08 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
s2kadl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Which GM Map Sensor?

Hi,

Ive got the greddy kit and was boosting to 14psi on the Omni 4 bar map sensor. While going WOT, Omni was great and operated extremely well. However When cruising or light throttle, car was extremely rough due to the smaller window for tuning.

Decided to chuck the 4 bar and want to know what people recommend in regards to GM map sensors. Tossing up between 2 bar and 3 bar. I really only want to boost to 14-15 psi on stock compression and thinking maybe the the 2 bar would be the best choice , giving me the best resolution for tuning.

Thoughts?

Cheers

Mark
Old 11-08-2008, 04:55 AM
  #2  
Registered User

 
SgtB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,947
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

14.7 = 1 bar. 2 sounds like a good window.
Old 11-08-2008, 08:32 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Asura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim, Orange County
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You should be able to use a 7 bar map sensor and have good driveability.

The capacity of the map sensor is not your issue. Your tuner should be able to optimize your map for your specific needs regardless of the upper value on the map sensor

-asura
Old 11-08-2008, 10:16 AM
  #4  
Registered User

 
SgtB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,947
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

A lower pressure map sensor does provide greater resolution though correct?
Old 11-08-2008, 10:29 AM
  #5  

 
JoeyBalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 9,570
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

14psi on the Greddy? How is that working out, 2mm hg? numbers?
Old 11-08-2008, 02:39 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Asura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim, Orange County
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SgtB,Nov 8 2008, 11:16 AM
A lower pressure map sensor does provide greater resolution though correct?
Not really true.

Your resolution is determined by your fuel table load points. Those are set by your tuner. Yes, the map sensor gives you a greater range, but who is really running more that 30 psi here??? That is a 2 bar. A 3.5 Bar sensor offers ~52psi max.

So if your car is seeing no more that 29 psi, what benefit is there to a map sensor that offers greater resolution from 10 to 40 psi higher?


Old 11-08-2008, 05:53 PM
  #7  
Registered User

 
SgtB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,947
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant that if both sensors use a 5v reference, the LOWER pressure sensor would have better resolution.
Old 11-08-2008, 06:10 PM
  #8  
Registered User

 
dsddcd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,964
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

This should help

http://www.plxdevices.com/AppNotes/PLXApp013.pdf

How are you going to modify the signal to the ECM with the Emanage though?
Old 11-09-2008, 12:42 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
s2kadl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks everyone.

Im using the AEM EMS.

Numbers were very good, look for post greddy E85 for some numbers.

As I understand it, the 2 bar should give much more resolution compared to a 4 bar. Really I dont need to read higher than 14psi so the 2 bar should do the job. Im getting it installed tomorrow and will let everyone know how I go.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ScienceofSpeed
Member S2000 Classifieds and For Sale
0
03-13-2012 05:37 PM



Quick Reply: Which GM Map Sensor?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:27 AM.