S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

i need to know what people think

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 04:38 PM
  #1  
s2000jrp's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default i need to know what people think

I just tuned my s2000 2002 whit a gt35r .63, whit a custom manifold, 3mm head gasket, aem ems, 3 inch full exhaust, brian crower stage2 camshaft, westgate 48mm turbosmart

i do on 91 octane 308 whp at 10 psi on a mustang dyno

please tell me something because i see people all the time on internet do like 400+ at 14 psi so im like what the hell im not gouing to do 400+ whit 14 psi its impossible but a lot off this people is on a dynajet dyno



thank you everybody to leave me a comment

Sorry for my english im from quebec city in canada and i speeking in french every day


Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 05:29 PM
  #2  
Blackpearl05's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Something has to be wrong. For 10 psi 308whp is really low. Who tuned your car?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 05:45 PM
  #3  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Most likely the tune is terrible.

Only other thing aside from obvious things like boost leaks, etc, would be a poorly designed manifold but I highly doubt that.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 05:49 PM
  #4  
JoeyBalls's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,570
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
Default

dumb question but why does 10psi with the Greddy produce 300WHP, and thats not considered low for the Greddy. I thought Boost was Boost???????. I mean I understand the size of the Turbo, but wouldn't a larger turbo just produce more PSI, or am I way off?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #5  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

[QUOTE=JoeyBalls,Mar 28 2008, 08:49 PM] dumb question but why does 10psi with the Greddy produce 300WHP, and thats not considered low for the Greddy.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 06:31 PM
  #6  
JoeyBalls's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,570
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Mar 28 2008, 05:56 PM
A larger turbo flows more CFMs of air then a smaller turbo so even though they are both pressurizing the air to 10psi, a larger turbo is flowing more overall air then a smaller one
thanks bro, makes sense
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #7  
sunhita's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Default

Also, the design of the Greddy manifold is not efficient.
The same applies to Inline log, which requires higher boost compare to tubular Lovefab for example.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 28, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #8  
WLAURENT's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 1
From: Mesa
Default

I made 317 WHP with 6.8 boost with a SOT SC (dyno attached). This was on a dyno dynamics treadmill that is considered "tight" when it comes to its HP readings. I am guessing they are pulling tons of timing on your tune.

Reply
Old Mar 28, 2008 | 10:04 PM
  #9  
afwfjustin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,423
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

The Crower camshafts have been proven to LOSE power. Someone here lost 60 rwhp by installing the Crower camshafts.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2008 | 05:11 AM
  #10  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by sunhita,Mar 29 2008, 12:16 AM
Also, the design of the Greddy manifold is not efficient.
The same applies to Inline log, which requires higher boost compare to tubular Lovefab for example.
Even then, with a 35r and the IP manifold, at 7psi I was making 320rwhp so I don't think its the manifold thats the problem (it looks like he has a tubular one anyway).

Tuner most likely.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:53 PM.