S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

IVTEC

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 10:29 PM
  #21  
02s2knick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Spoolin,Jan 9 2010, 10:14 PM
It would be interesting to see if it could be done with the F20c and F22c engines. Would the currently available standalone EMS's even be capable of running this on a F20c or F22c engine?

For those that dont know much about it, here is a basic rundown.

iVTEC(intelligent-VTEC)[3] introduced continuously variable camshaft phasing on the intake cam of DOHC VTEC engines. The technology first appeared on Honda's K-series four cylinder engine family in 2001 (2002 in the U.S.). In the United States, Honda first debuted the technology on the 2003 Honda Civic Si EP3 with the economy version.

Valve lift and duration are still limited to distinct low- and high-RPM profiles, but the intake camshaft is now capable of advancing between 25 and 50 degrees (depending upon engine configuration) during operation. Phase changes are implemented by a computer controlled, oil driven adjustable cam gear. Phasing is determined by a combination of engine load and rpm, ranging from fully retarded at idle to somewhat advanced at full throttle and low rpm. The effect is further optimization of torque output, especially at low and midrange RPM.
a AEM EMS could control it i beleave. My friends 625whp Rsx Type S has the AEM ems and he runs a stock head with K20a (integra type r) cams. and i think with some machining in the cam towers to run a oil feed line to the top of the cam tower and send the oil through a block that is machined for the Ivtec selonid set in then that would feed the Intake side of the cam with Ivtec. and i beleave Kpro could tune this as long as it was a k20a or z selonid.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 10:36 PM
  #22  
02s2knick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Default

haha holy crap i seen the kit that coming out by craftworks after i posted that and they did EXACTLY wat i came up with in 2seconds of thinking about it lol. Being a mechanical engineer=win
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 01:57 PM
  #23  
trich101's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, TN
Default

Anyone look at the product page on his site yet.. ?

http://www.designcraftfab.com/online-store...onic-cam-system

it has a price.. $2750
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 03:57 PM
  #24  
joes sled 2000's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 7
From: tiverton
Default

MMMMM No .
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 04:48 PM
  #25  
Sideways's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 21
From: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by trich101,Mar 16 2010, 02:57 PM
Anyone look at the product page on his site yet.. ?

http://www.designcraftfab.com/online-store...onic-cam-system

it has a price.. $2750
Did you miss the group buy for $2200?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 07:22 PM
  #26  
Andrewap1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Default

i'd be interested if it made some good results on a turbo application. I'm sure it would, but i'd have to see the gains before i'm sold on it.
Looks like it'd be worth the buy though.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 07:30 PM
  #27  
trich101's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, TN
Default

Actually I did miss that. I just saw a ton of ppl in several threads asking for news. No one has posted that pic yet as far a I know.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 08:30 PM
  #28  
m R g S r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
From: Westchester NY
Default

still 2200......i know it's a great adoption of technology onto our motor and i'm glad people are doing this, but 2200 is a ton of $$ for this. i think if someone is doing this for a pure power increase, they could build a spare block for not that much more, use a stock head, and make 8xxwhp
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 05:13 AM
  #29  
joes sled 2000's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 7
From: tiverton
Default

Originally Posted by m R g S r,Mar 17 2010, 12:30 AM
still 2200......i know it's a great adoption of technology onto our motor and i'm glad people are doing this, but 2200 is a ton of $$ for this. i think if someone is doing this for a pure power increase, they could build a spare block for not that much more, use a stock head, and make 8xxwhp
I agree here too much $$$$$ . Im in for results (real world) .
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 09:53 AM
  #30  
trich101's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, TN
Default

The results he got on the BC time attack car where very impressive. Added 90 peak hp without adding more boost or increasing displacement. If you dropped $5000 on a turbo setup, this can make it come in alot sooner. I think this is an amazing tuning option to help make our engines even better all around. It appears to really help on low and mid range the most.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:54 AM.