Here's a couple videos of the tune. These are phone camera's quality so they aren't as good. Final runs wasn't captured cause phone ran out of battery.

528whp @ 18psi on 91pump.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ke1y1nFVNmc [/media]

637whp @ 25psi on Q16.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHdOL99jV6s [/media]

 

i cant wait to see pics of your car!

 

Thanks Nick, you should come down next time Mase' come down, we had a blast out here man.

 

What would be the difference in running a .63 compared to and .82 A/R on the 6262?

 

Agreed. You'll get the same power but more lag with a 6265.

 

I've never seen high 700's off of a 6262 let alone 800's. Seen mid 700's though. I always figured you'd have to step up to the 6765 for 800's.

 

I've never seen 800's on the 6262 either, maybe 750 or so..you would be in the 35lb range at that.

Anyway, solid numbers, good to see I was pretty close as well, although mine spools a little later due to the bigger housing.

6262BB .82 a/r
642whp / 418wtq @ 24lbs on 93/meth

 

^^You'll have to check out AMS's website then. On their EVO they made something like 810 whp at about 42 psi on the 850R, which is the Precision 6262.

 

Thats on an EVO. I have YET to see any Honda running a 6262 making over 800whp w/that turbo.

Yes I know our motors are WAY more efficient than an evo motor, just hasn't happened.

 

I was only saying that the 6262 is capable of over 800 whp, regardless of what 4 cylinder it was on. If it can be done with a less efficient head on an 4g63, it can also be done on the very efficient F20c, just less boost.

This reminds me though, isnt Fernando from CFT running the 6265 and making 835 whp or something. That right there shows you the 6262 or 6265 can make over 800 whp on our cars and its been done. There was a test done by AMS between the 6262 and 6265 to see if the 6265 produced more top end power and it didnt. Both turbo's made the exact same peak power but the 6265 only spooled up slower.