preping for S/C
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,645
Likes: 0
From: The HS that is NoVA
Originally Posted by news2kroller,Aug 10 2006, 10:24 AM
CAPTKIRK..of those 90k+ miles how many of them have been with the turbo on them?
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: orange county
i got a leakdown test done yesterday by autowave. here are the humbers
(#1)6% (#2)6% (#3)6% (#4) 10%. As i understand anything under about 15% is a good reading. how do these numbers look guys?
CHRIS
(#1)6% (#2)6% (#3)6% (#4) 10%. As i understand anything under about 15% is a good reading. how do these numbers look guys?
CHRIS
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
From: 951
Originally Posted by CaptKirk,Aug 9 2006, 05:00 AM
Hmm, I wonder how a leakdown test would work with a turbo kit already installed... Would you disconnect the charge pipes going to the IM and coming off of the turbo to get an idea of the leakage?
And nothing explicitly leads me to suspect damage to cylinder walls. Just sheer paranoia mixed with the fact that I have 90,9xx miles on the car. lol. I just like to be VERY cautious.
Thanks for all the info though
And nothing explicitly leads me to suspect damage to cylinder walls. Just sheer paranoia mixed with the fact that I have 90,9xx miles on the car. lol. I just like to be VERY cautious.
Thanks for all the info though
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
From: orange county
my engine number is 1025386. i read in a thread that the bolts were changed at engine #1025386 and in another thread the number was 11025386. anyone have a conclusive answer? thanks.