S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Pushing stock motor

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #11  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyBalls,Aug 4 2008, 01:19 PM
IS it just more the PSI? for example my Turbo is tiny so 10PSI is a lot less air then lets say.........a bigger turbo
Right you must look at CFMs rather then psi (aka look at volume rather then pressure).

Then other things like manifold design, etc come into play.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 10:31 AM
  #12  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Here is my semi big write up on how to size out a turbocharger for your application. Some math might be involved


https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...&#entry13198173
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 01:17 PM
  #13  
kutsujula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Default

Yea im making 420whp now on pump gas, thats fine for everyday but for the v8 guys running the bottles im needing some more power, im looking at 5-550 on c16
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #14  
devs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by kutsujula,Aug 4 2008, 05:17 PM
Yea im making 420whp now on pump gas, thats fine for everyday but for the v8 guys running the bottles im needing some more power, im looking at 5-550 on c16
GT3076 on FR mani right? how many lbs to hit 420whp?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 01:47 PM
  #15  
afwfjustin's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,423
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

^Would probably take 9 or 10 to hit that with the FR manifold.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 01:52 PM
  #16  
devs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by afwfjustin,Aug 4 2008, 05:47 PM
^Would probably take 9 or 10 to hit that with the FR manifold.
all else being equal, would a twin scroll tubular manifold with a true divided housing on the turbo be more, less, or equally as efficient as a standard FR tubular manifold?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 01:55 PM
  #17  
kutsujula's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Default

its actually a 35R now.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 05:21 PM
  #18  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by devs2k,Aug 4 2008, 04:52 PM
all else being equal, would a twin scroll tubular manifold with a true divided housing on the turbo be more, less, or equally as efficient as a standard FR tubular manifold?
I thought the only advantage with twin scroll is faster spooling but pretty much the same power output?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #19  
devs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Aug 4 2008, 09:21 PM
I thought the only advantage with twin scroll is faster spooling but pretty much the same power output?
sounds about right; i'm not really sure
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 07:11 AM
  #20  
JDM_EM1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Default

im making 375hp on 10psi (hi boost) and 339 on 8psi(low boost). daily driven now with more than 12k boosted so far. Stock Motor, Custom kit, pump gas...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:14 PM.