S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Putting my car on a DynoJet today...

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 5, 2009 | 11:19 AM
  #21  
AndyFloyd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TRBOKEV,Sep 5 2009, 11:08 AM
Lol wherever you live the dyno's suck! Can't go past 8k, can't show tq. I hope your only paying half price for such shifty data capture...
louisville, ky. Man the dynamics I ran on was almost EXACTLY the same as this dynojet. The dynamics I run on has a 1.18 correction for Dynojet numbers and it works out perfectly as we can clearly see as both dynos read similar. I am going to PM Jeff Evans about his ignition setup so I can make 21-22psi and finally crack 500whp. Its a goal now...this turbo is going to make 500 on my setup.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2009 | 11:25 AM
  #22  
AndyFloyd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Revenge,Sep 5 2009, 09:51 AM
Andy maybe you could list your mods, but I don't think you have a 3mm. It looks to me like your turbo is near it's max. Your HP per psi just goes down as your boost goes up. Your numbers seem real good, if your happy with your number then be done with it. If not there is always the gt35 or similar turbo. I think everyone knows by now dyno number are for tuning, they help but differnt dynos read so differnet.
here are ALL my mods that i can think of....

PFAB ELT Topmount
GT3076R 2.5" outlet ( standard 4 bolt T31 housing )
2.5"-3" bellmouth downpipe
3" exhaust ( no cat ) HKS Ti muffler ( all vband )
2.5" IC PFAB piping, 31x3x12 Stage 2 PFAB IC, Tial BOV 50mm
Tial 44mm wastegate
AEM EMS 1052, precision 780's, honda resistor box
Walbro 255lph
ACT street disk/PP 370ft/lb holding capacity
PLX wideband, AEM Tru-boost ( bitch to get boost correct )

Thats about it i think. I got HD video too that will be posted later. Raced a c6 z06 last night. Dead even...spun 2nd and 3rd got behind 3 cars, came back by the end of 5th.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2009 | 12:52 PM
  #23  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

Congrats on hthe numbers. They are very strong indeed. I want to say thank u for being an honest stand up guy. Car is moving!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #24  
AndyFloyd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by camuman,Sep 5 2009, 12:52 PM
Congrats on hthe numbers. They are very strong indeed. I want to say thank u for being an honest stand up guy. Car is moving!!!!
haha thanks man, i appreciate it.


I guess after seeing how some people make 540whp on 17psi, and 509whp on 15psi I thought I can too. Both those cars I mentioned dynoed on a hub dyno ( dyna-pack ) I believe. I am not bashing anoyone but I know the car that put down 540/400 went to a mustang dyno and made 475whp/ 325 ft/lb. That sounds more normal doesnt it? I dont see how that car could lose almost 80whp and the owner not feel it. Thats because some dynos are so inflated...I guess I am happy but I thought 500whp would be easier than this. Its ok, I will work toward my goal.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #25  
s_d2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Default

amazing numbers..
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #26  
300sx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, IN
Default

Nice!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #27  
AndyFloyd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 300sx,Sep 5 2009, 01:43 PM
Nice!
saw your times in your thread. You need to dyno your beast!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2009 | 03:57 PM
  #28  
300sx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, IN
Default

I'm hoping to real soon...
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2009 | 06:13 AM
  #29  
Revenge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Annapolis MD
Default

So at the end of the day, what number are you going with? With all your pulls, what is the % differnace between the dyno dynamics and the dyno jet? I saw you had some type of correction factor, what does that equate to?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2009 | 06:22 AM
  #30  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

The thing u have to watch out for is the dynojet dyamics sometimes have a correction factor and if the dyno operator doesn't tell u then u have no idea it's there. For instance my 332 dyno dyAmics number is uncorrected. 10 to 12 % is typical to add but in this case 18% was needed. I wish I could add 18% hehe. Anywho when u dyno just know that to compare to other cars u need to know what dyno an what corrections.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:41 AM.