S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

remote mount turbo anyone tried them?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 06:43 AM
  #1  
02serv's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Homosassa,FL
Default remote mount turbo anyone tried them?

Has anyone tried this setup on a s before? I have seen one on a 350z for what the guy had into it didn't seem that bad.

www.ststurbo.com
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 02:30 PM
  #2  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

Why? You like lag or something?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #3  
*JG*'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 597
Likes: 1
From: VA
Default

Pretty sure you have plenty of room in the engine bay of the s to keep all the turbo components in the bay. I think these kits are designed to fit when there is no other space for it anywhere else. Just my .02
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 04:21 PM
  #4  
Deception's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,036
Likes: 4
From: FAR BEYOND THE WHEEL...
Default

the price alone would scare me away, $3000 for a twin turbo system? Its gotta be the biggest POS for that price
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 04:43 PM
  #5  
GrandMasterKhan's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 17
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

seriously. our engine bay has TONS of room for a turbo
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 05:19 PM
  #6  
02serv's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Homosassa,FL
Default

just something different
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 05:21 PM
  #7  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by GrandMasterKhan,Mar 7 2010, 08:43 PM
seriously. our engine bay has TONS of room for a turbo
bango.

its one thing to put that crap on a ctsv that has no space at all in teh engine bay and wont suffer much at all from turbo lag. its another on a small displacement motor that has tons of room in the bay.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2010 | 08:03 PM
  #8  
Spoolin's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,507
Likes: 51
From: Sellersburg, IN
Default

These setups are good for V6's and V8's because they have more volume of air moving from having more cylinders which helps with not too bad of lag. But with a 4 cylinder, there just isnt enough air moving to keep the lag at a minimum. I wouldnt recommend one of these kits for any 4 cylinder car.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 06:08 AM
  #9  
deathsled's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

[QUOTE=Deception,Mar 7 2010, 08:21 PM] the price alone would scare me away,
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 09:21 AM
  #10  
Artisan7471's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
From: Reno Nevada
Default

Yea these kits are actually not a bad idea, especially for people runing low boost on factory motors. They are very cheap because they dont require a manifold, intercooler or require rearranging your engine bay. Anybody that has installed a turbo kit on the S knows the amount of stuff you have to remove and rearrange to install the kit. It would be kinda of nice to only remove the air box and rear exhaust to install your turbo kit. Thats one of the things I dont like about my engine bay, everything is modded or moved. Oil filter is relocated, oil cooler relocated, heat sheilds are gone, stock header is gone, fuse box is relocated, eps is relocated, battery is in the trunk, heater lines relocated, air conditioner lines bent, air pump modded, crank case vent system modded. There may be some lag, but with a small turbo, how laggy would it be? I wish someone would try it out so we could see.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:11 AM.