S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Stock fuel pump on a "Stage 1" SC kit?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 04:04 PM
  #11  
Soul Coughing's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 71
From: Chiswick
Default

I have a stock pulled Comptech kit with the 255 walby, and I still sometimes get 12.5 a/f when its cooler outside (had adjusted the RRFPR ad nauseum) . I am considering getting a bit bigger pump to make sure I don't go too lean as I lost my original motor to lean condition back in 2006. I personally wouldn't risk running the stock pump.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2015 | 05:17 PM
  #12  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

But 12.5 is a totally acceptable ratio, especially on a Stage 1 kit.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 09:09 AM
  #13  
Dens2k152mph's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Default

Yes I learned that, by speaking with ^^coolGuy094 & s2000Junky. And now my stage1 is @ 12:5 AFR. With no issue's (knocking on wood). And I hear some guys have gone even in the 13:0's.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 09:43 AM
  #14  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Dens2k152mph
Yes I learned that, by speaking with ^^coolGuy094 & s2000Junky. And now my stage1 is @ 12:5 AFR. With no issue's (knocking on wood). And I hear some guys have gone even in the 13:0's.
I was running 13's on my stage 1, lol. Maxing at 13.5, dropping back down to high 12's.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 10:22 AM
  #15  
Soul Coughing's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 71
From: Chiswick
Default

Originally Posted by CoolGuy094
But 12.5 is a totally acceptable ratio, especially on a Stage 1 kit.
It has gone higher on a couple occasions. For me personally, I'm more risk adverse, so I'd rather not have to worry about losing another motor. I'm a little rusty on the SOS setup and if it uses a box to retard timing, but on my CTSC, I just have a 12:1 FPR and a map clamp, so a couple higher gear pulls in the high 12's to low 13's is too risky for me.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 10:28 AM
  #16  
Soul Coughing's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 71
From: Chiswick
Default

Originally Posted by CoolGuy094
Originally Posted by Dens2k152mph' timestamp='1420567770' post='23458239
Yes I learned that, by speaking with ^^coolGuy094 & s2000Junky. And now my stage1 is @ 12:5 AFR. With no issue's (knocking on wood). And I hear some guys have gone even in the 13:0's.
I was running 13's on my stage 1, lol. Maxing at 13.5, dropping back down to high 12's.
I don't mean this disrespectfully, as S2000junky has added a lot to the S2K community, but he is not an average supercharger user, and he has gone through a couple motors over the years in pursuit of his goals. All I'm saying is that past experience doesn't guarantee future results. For a couple hundred dollars and a few hours of your time, I'd put in a higher capacity fuel pump which could possibly prevent a catastrophic failure if you hit the "perfect storm."
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 10:38 AM
  #17  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

No worries. As mentioned earlier in this thread I did end up just putting the Walbro in.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 11:22 AM
  #18  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

It appears im late to the party, sorry about that. Back in my "stage one" days, it became quite apparent that the fuel pressure needed to run the proper afr wasn’t achievable with the stock fuel pump. Ive run the typical nosy walboro 255, but eventually moved on the FB340, and found that to be the best solution to deliver all the fuel needed, with a direct drop in to the stock filter/hanger assembly and be quiet. This fuel pump will work great from a base stage one system where the rrfpr is used, all the way up to 500whp+ set ups.

Obviously with larger after market injector and EMS to control injector duty cycle at the factory 43.psi base pressure, a after market larger fuel pump doesn’t have the same importance as it would with just relying on fuel pressure to deliver the amount of fuel needed.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 12:57 PM
  #19  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
It appears im late to the party, sorry about that. Back in my "stage one" days, it became quite apparent that the fuel pressure needed to run the proper afr wasn’t achievable with the stock fuel pump. Ive run the typical nosy walboro 255, but eventually moved on the FB340, and found that to be the best solution to deliver all the fuel needed, with a direct drop in to the stock filter/hanger assembly and be quiet. This fuel pump will work great from a base stage one system where the rrfpr is used, all the way up to 500whp+ set ups.

Obviously with larger after market injector and EMS to control injector duty cycle at the factory 43.psi base pressure, a after market larger fuel pump doesn’t have the same importance as it would with just relying on fuel pressure to deliver the amount of fuel needed.
Thanks for the reply. This was the theoretical conclusion I came to but I wanted to see if anyone had the experience such as yourself.

I've now had two Aeromotive 340's fail on me; the most recent while on the dyno. I've become a little skeptical moving forward about buying them again. I believe my next personal aftermarket pump purchase will be the new FB290 pump.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2015 | 05:29 PM
  #20  
99SH's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,677
Likes: 9
Default

If you want a quality pump go with Weldon; however not sure if they make in-tank pumps.

Unlike anything else in the market, these are made from metal (no plastic parts) and built in the USA.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:46 AM.