S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

supercharger pulley psi

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 17, 2015 | 04:36 PM
  #1  
rmerchant3's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 604
Likes: 15
Default supercharger pulley psi

I wanted to start a thread where people posted their pulley size and engine size with the resulting psi. Adding which blower kit you are using will be helpful too. If you are using an intercooler or aftercooler, that info would be helpful for informational purposes. I've got a 3.8, 3.4, and 3.2 for my novi 1220. Looking to get ideas for which to use, but this information will be helpful to a lot of people. One thing to remember is that PSI is not everything. CFM has to be taken into account as well. As a general rule, the 1220 will make less power than the 1200 at the same PSI due to the CFM rating.

Novi 1220

CoolGuy094: AP1 engine, Novi 1220, 700ft above sea level
4.8" = 6-7 PSI
3.4" = 14-16 PSI
3.2" = 16-18 PSI

rmerchant3: AP2 engine, Novi 1220SL, 89ft above sea level
3.4" = 12.2 PSI

Novi 1200

pwrinxs: AP2 engine, Novi 1200
4.0" = 8.3 PSI

s2000Junky: Custom engine, Novi 1200
3.2" = 16.5 PSI

LDfavoriteson AP2 engine, Novi 1200
3.6" = 16 PSI
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 12:24 AM
  #2  
Sideways's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,033
Likes: 21
From: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Default

It's not that simple. Results vary so do it and see.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 04:20 AM
  #3  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

If you're going standalone ECU then I personally would just put the 3.2" on and be done with it. No reason to jip yourself out of more boost.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 04:25 AM
  #4  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

From my personal experience:

AP1 motor
Novi 1220
Comptech aftercooler
~700 ft above sea level

4.8" = 6-7 PSI
3.4" = 14-16 PSI
3.2" = 16-18 PSI

Lower number was when it was hotter/more humid. Higher number was when it was colder/less humid.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 09:43 AM
  #5  
rmerchant3's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 604
Likes: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Sideways
It's not that simple. Results vary so do it and see.
I think we could get a general average though. I would love to try them all and see, but for the sake of my wallet and my tuner's time he'd like to have the one on that we need to get the goal I'm looking for. I am shooting for 375-400whp. He seems to think the 3.4 will do the trick, but across this board many seem to go with the 3.2 to reach those numbers. I have seen evan's tuning reach 400 with the 3.4 as well. My biggest thing is to keep it safe and rich. I don't want to have to lean it out to reach the numbers on a bigger pulley.

Originally Posted by CoolGuy094
If you're going standalone ECU then I personally would just put the 3.2" on and be done with it. No reason to jip yourself out of more boost.

Originally Posted by CoolGuy094
From my personal experience:

AP1 motor
Novi 1220
Comptech aftercooler
~700 ft above sea level

4.8" = 6-7 PSI
3.4" = 14-16 PSI
3.2" = 16-18 PSI

Lower number was when it was hotter/more humid. Higher number was when it was colder/less humid.

That's some good info. 14-16psi seems plenty. I would assume on an ap2 it would be 13-14.

I'll post my experince on here too when I get mine done.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 11:20 AM
  #6  
CoolGuy094's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 10
Default

If your trying to hit 400 WHP with a Novi 1220 on an AP2, then you should go with the smallest pulley available. Like you said, the 3.2" on your car with the lower red line might only make in that 14 PSI range versus the 16-18 that it made on mine. And even at 16-18 PSI I was at like 390 WHP but E85 put me over that tipping point. The Novi 1200 flows more CFM and allows for more power at similar boost levels compared to the Novi 1220. We are at a bit of a disadvantage.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 11:24 AM
  #7  
LDfavoriteson's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 787
Likes: 4
From: the slums of south carolina...
Default

I have a 05 ap2 I'm on 3.6 or 3.4 (can't remember at the moment) and a novi 1200 the car made 16 psi
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 18, 2015 | 12:07 PM
  #8  
rmerchant3's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 604
Likes: 15
Default

I'll throw the 3.2 on just to be safe. You can always throw more fuel at it to bring it down.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 04:58 PM
  #9  
DaGou's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 3
From: Myrtle Beach
Default

Reply
Old Feb 18, 2015 | 07:32 PM
  #10  
surferboy120's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Default

Its interesting that you guys all go for the smaller blower pulley which the smaller you go the more belt slip you will deal with. Why don't more of you use the crank pulley as an option to not only keep better belt wrap but also to increase boost. ASP is making me a 6.5 crank pulley (vortech uses a 6" crank pulley). This will allow me to see a few more psi without introducing belt slip with my current 3.8 blower pulley setup.

I suspect its more related to cost then anything else.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 AM.