S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Talking to SOS about turbo or S/C

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 07:01 PM
  #1  
AZ-S2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 3
Default Talking to SOS about turbo or S/C

So I've been talking to Science of Speed and talking about engine work and going either turbo or S/C. Personally at 99K miles I thought an engine refresh would do, which to me is new valve-cover gasket, titanium retainers and dual valve-springs, head gasket, and timing guide and engine inspection. I heard that superchargers in the long run are less reliable because of constant boost that cause problems for the top of the piston but Im not sure if that's right. So I was thinking turbo, but idk. Talk me into one of the two. Prices are similar.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 08:45 PM
  #2  
RacerXI's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,650
Likes: 20
From: Dothan, AL
Default

How much power do you want? If not power, what 1/4 mile number are you looking for?

Will this be daily driven?
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 08:54 PM
  #3  
Moddiction's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

You will most likely be in boost or at least much less boost with a supercharger. I would say the sc is hands down much more reliable over all but a properly done turbo setup can be fairly reliable as well. There's no constant boost. If your not heavy on the throttle you won't have any boost.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 09:22 PM
  #4  
teamvalorracing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
From: Lakeland, Florida
Default

sos, like all kits, uses a bpv to bleed boost under vac.

Turbo will give better usable power in the 400+ range.
sc is less drama and less maintenance, but also less power.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2012 | 10:18 PM
  #5  
AZ-S2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 3
Default

And see I lean more towards an S/C because I want more power but not over kill. Plus Im all about reliability at this point. Do you guys think I should do any engine work? Banjo bolt is a for sure thing.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2012 | 04:21 AM
  #6  
Importedpower's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, South Carolina
Default

if ap1 valve retainers hands down are a must.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2012 | 05:34 AM
  #7  
JUSTINTHECOASTIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,805
Likes: 15
From: St.Petersburg/Tampa, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Importedpower
if ap1 valve retainers hands down are a must.
What? LOL
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2012 | 05:55 AM
  #8  
Moddiction's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

AP1 valve retainers here and 165k miles and boosted for a couple of years with no issues. They are weaker but if not cracked they are ok.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 07:44 AM
  #9  
Deception's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 6,036
Likes: 4
From: FAR BEYOND THE WHEEL...
Default

Try turbo first, if it gets to be too much of a headache then sell it & get an s/c kit.

The only thing you "need" to do to a healthy F20 is the oil squirter upgrade.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 09:22 AM
  #10  
Importedpower's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, South Carolina
Default

werent some of the f20's equiped with the upgraded squirters?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 PM.