S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Is there a direct replacement header for Inline log?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 03:29 AM
  #1  
cujet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 179
Likes: 1
Default Is there a direct replacement header for Inline log?

My 04 has the Inline Pro log manifold. While I could fabricate a 321 stainless header as I've done in the past, I'd like to consider purchasing a "drop in replacement". Are there any such animals? Or are the other setups different enough that my turbo would end up in a different location or angle?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 04:58 AM
  #2  
bruthaboost's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 945
Likes: 70
From: Midland
Default

I've been here for a while and have yet to see one. The only cast manifold replacement I'm aware of is the greddy/Pfab swap.

BTW, if you haven't already, it wouldn't hurt to check your passenger side engine mount.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 05:52 AM
  #3  
passmans2kny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 0
From: huntington long island
Default

full race ramhorn will have the turbo in a very similar location
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 06:44 AM
  #4  
KaNgArOo's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: wausau
Default

There is a guy that works at synapes performance that made a drop in replacement tubular manifold for the inlinepro log. I should have bought it when he was selling it. Now he is just selling the whole car.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 11:36 AM
  #5  
cujet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 179
Likes: 1
Default

Thanks for the replies.

I'm not needing more power. But, I am in need of more response. My Inline Pro setup is the most unresponsive turbo setup I've ever driven. The turbo header can help build boost faster. I guess if I decide I need one, I'll build it myself.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 12:59 PM
  #6  
riceball777's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 76
From: Los angeles
Default

The log manifold responds and spools much faster than a tubular manifold. The log manifold also makes a lot less power

check out my results of the log vs tubular spool time

https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/100...#entry22271490

my signature has results of how much more power tubular manifolds make over logs
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 04:33 PM
  #7  
cujet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 179
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by riceball777
The log manifold responds and spools much faster than a tubular manifold. The log manifold also makes a lot less power

check out my results of the log vs tubular spool time

https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/100...#entry22271490

my signature has results of how much more power tubular manifolds make over logs
I agree that a log manifold and it's tiny volume will provide more responsive pulses to the turbine, thereby spinning it up faster at low rpm and no boost conditions. But, under high boost conditions, such as at high RPM, the log manifold suffers mightily. We did plenty of tuning on turbo engines that prove the viability of well designed tubular headers. High RPM throttle response is better with a short, equal length, tubular header without sharp bends or excessive volume and a smooth transition in the collector. There is a reason road race engines use tubular, equal length headers.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 04:33 PM
  #8  
cujet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 179
Likes: 1
Default

Oops. Double tap.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cujet
S2000 Forced Induction
1
Jan 11, 2015 05:30 AM
Prokaw875
S2000 Forced Induction
49
Dec 12, 2012 03:08 PM
turbosix
S2000 Forced Induction
5
Oct 30, 2008 03:21 PM
Hobbyholic
Archived Member S2000 Classifieds and For Sale
8
May 21, 2003 05:03 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:12 PM.