S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

V-3i SuperCharger

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 07:12 AM
  #1  
ChangM3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default V-3i SuperCharger

Looking at http://www.HorsePowerFreaks.com and I see Vortech makes a V-3i supercharger kit for my 2007 S2000. What are your experiences with the approximate RWHP gains in terms of a stock S2000. I'm not looking for 550 RWHP, but if the car with the S/C doesn't at least gain 130 RWHP from stock it's not worth investing $6,145.00 in that particular kit.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 07:14 AM
  #2  
JoeyBalls's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,570
Likes: 3
From: New Jersey
Default

I think you can hit 400RWHP
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 08:22 AM
  #3  
camuman's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 6
From: South Florida
Default

u can hit 400whp dynojet with a voretch and 12-15psi boost. i dont know the exact amount of boost, but its prolly closer to 15.

flashpro + id 1000 injectors + walbro pump + KB BAP will be your best friends.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 02:13 PM
  #4  
nsx_bob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Default

all you need is 12 psi, full exhaust, flashpro, injectors.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 02:42 PM
  #5  
Stoic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: LaVergne, TN
Default

$5,708.00


I'll just Inline pro stage 1 it and save the other 2K for a rainy day. God lord, that a lot of money.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 03:05 PM
  #6  
chef-j's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 1
From: NY/MI/TX/S.Korea
Default

Vortech has many kind of blower. I do not know about s2000 setup. But usually t-trim with small pulley can net you pretyt good crazy power.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #7  
chef-j's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 1
From: NY/MI/TX/S.Korea
Default

Btw 400rwhp sc < 400rwhp turbo. Some guys likes sc smooth power like n/a feels over turbo(some thinks it cost less than turbo, but no). If you just looking for power, don't waste money on sc, go with turbo.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 26, 2010 | 06:13 PM
  #8  
Stoic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: LaVergne, TN
Default

Originally Posted by chef-j,Feb 26 2010, 04:25 PM
Btw 400rwhp sc < 400rwhp turbo. Some guys likes sc smooth power like n/a feels over turbo(some thinks it cost less than turbo, but no). If you just looking for power, don't waste money on sc, go with turbo.
I guess it comes down to engine liability(longer lasting).. I'm basically stuck on what to do with my car. To turbo or not to turbo.. To SC or not to SC. That is the real question.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 06:42 PM
  #9  
RL1924's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,569
Likes: 0
From: Bergen Co. New Jersey
Default

Seems for the most part,
SC= less power roughly amount of $$ more reliable
Turbo= more power, more tinkering less reliable

I know some guys with turbos may not have problems this just just an overall from what I notice
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2010 | 10:03 PM
  #10  
Stoic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: LaVergne, TN
Default

Originally Posted by RL1924,Feb 26 2010, 07:42 PM
Seems for the most part,
SC= less power roughly amount of $$ more reliable
Turbo= more power, more tinkering less reliable

I know some guys with turbos may not have problems this just just an overall from what I notice
It's a crap shoot.. Some people that have turbochargers never have a problem, then you have people that've had nothing but problems..
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:04 PM.