06 s2k vs 03 Rsx Type S
Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
From: Miami Heat won!
Stfu about the rsx vs the s2k already. The rsx in the video handed the s2000 its ass. Plain and simple. K20 reacts to mods alot better than the s2000. This shit is old already. The s2000 is far from the fastest car out there. It's a 35k sports car with good handling and a fun powerplant. No more no less.
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,214
Likes: 2
From: West Coast
Originally Posted by truths2k05,May 10 2006, 09:05 AM
Stfu about the rsx vs the s2k already. The rsx in the video handed the s2000 its ass. Plain and simple. K20 reacts to mods alot better than the s2000. This shit is old already. The s2000 is far from the fastest car out there. It's a 35k sports car with good handling and a fun powerplant. No more no less.
Ok I am done...
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JsAP1,May 10 2006, 09:10 AM
I actually agree with you. The RSX did win but still looked slow doing so.
Ok I am done...
Ok I am done...
Registered User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JsAP1,May 10 2006, 08:53 AM
Ok you want stock numbers for the S2000? Still more than an RSXS.
The RSX numbers are right on straight from AEM. The dynos I have seen seem to support this so I take it as valid. You can take it or leave it, I dont care. I am not here to argue. I believe what I have experienced and have seen over the past 10 years. I am just telling you how the RSX stacks up against other cars, thats all.
205 hp
137 ft/lbs
Still more than
167 hp
122 ft/lbs
The RSX could have 180hp for all I care and 135 ft/lbs of tq. Still would be slower than a stock S2000.
Next..
The RSX numbers are right on straight from AEM. The dynos I have seen seem to support this so I take it as valid. You can take it or leave it, I dont care.
I am not here to argue. I believe what I have experienced and have seen over the past 10 years. I am just telling you how the RSX stacks up against other cars, thats all. 205 hp
137 ft/lbs
Still more than
167 hp
122 ft/lbs
The RSX could have 180hp for all I care and 135 ft/lbs of tq. Still would be slower than a stock S2000.
Next..
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
I am one PROUD owner of an S2k, but I do admit that a RSX-S with about 1K worth of bolt ons will literally tear my stock s2k up. Even if my s2k had intake and exhaust, I'd get my ass spanked. Let's just admit it and move on folks. RSX-S comes with a LOT of room for improvements while the S2k is pretty much fully tuned from the factory. Admit it and move the #### on.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: New York
-I like the helmet on the buddy club race car
-both the s2k and the rsx-s are sweet and with a few bucks from the piggy bank, both cars will perform excellent. Which car has more potential (all around)?
Lets focus on those 2 things for now before this turns into road rage against both cars.
-both the s2k and the rsx-s are sweet and with a few bucks from the piggy bank, both cars will perform excellent. Which car has more potential (all around)?
Lets focus on those 2 things for now before this turns into road rage against both cars.
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
i think the point everobody's makin here is that stock for stock, yes, the s2k is the faster _straightline_ car. however, being that the k responds to mods better than the f, an rsx-s with i/e/rh and kpro is the faster car, in a _straightline_.
that's it. not sure why thatt's so hard to understand for some ppl....
that's it. not sure why thatt's so hard to understand for some ppl....