The S2000 Gallery Cornucopia of sight and sound! Show your friends your S2000 photos, S2000 images, S2000 photochops and S2000 videos.
View Poll Results: What looks better?
17" NT03
31.11%
18" NT03+M
68.89%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

1st Gen NT03 or NT03+M

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #1  
rwdCivic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: dc
Default 1st Gen NT03 or NT03+M

I recently picked these uber rare 1st gen NT03's up and trying to decide if I should keep them or go for the 18" concave face 2nd gen NT03.
*Disclaimer* These were only test fitted and therefore my alignment specs and ride height are off and I would swap out the tires for smaller sizes if I keep the wheels.

I'm really liking the 17" look because the 18"s look a bit dub'ish to me but I love the concave face. I cannot choose help me s2ki.

17x8 +45 235/45 I will swap for 225/45
17x9 +43 275/40 '' '' 255/40






Side view:



18x9.5 +40 NT03+M w/245/40 all 4 corners.


Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #2  
sillyboybmxer's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,744
Likes: 31
From: Nevada
Default

i personally feel the concave ones a lot more
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 02:43 PM
  #3  
AP1.5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: OC, CA
Default

Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #4  
suzukablueS2000's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: kuwait
Default

both are fantastic.. but yes the 18" is too big imo. go for the old gen and be different
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 02:57 PM
  #5  
KingVen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Default

18 concave for sure.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #6  
Ezekiel55's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

18 concave looks way better!
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #7  
armos2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Default

I actually have a set of NT03+m in 18s w/ 255 tires all around that i will be using in the summer for cruising, but for the track i have rpf1s.

I think you need to have less the 1/2 inch cap to pull of the 18s.
I have -3 camber front and -2.5 rear.

I was scared to get 18s because like everyone I thought they would look big, but i love them.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 06:59 AM
  #8  
rwdCivic's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: dc
Default

Originally Posted by armos2k,Dec 24 2009, 11:13 PM
I actually have a set of NT03+m in 18s w/ 255 tires all around that i will be using in the summer for cruising, but for the track i have rpf1s.

I think you need to have less the 1/2 inch cap to pull of the 18s.
I have -3 camber front and -2.5 rear.

I was scared to get 18s because like everyone I thought they would look big, but i love them.
Really have any pictures of the 18"s? I would love to see more shots before I make a decision. As of right now I just feel the 17"s make the car look a little more "tough" and the 18"s look like bling.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 07:50 AM
  #9  
dres2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: Jerseyyyyy
Default



if you don't want the 17's, I'd offer to buy the rear wheels off ya. mine are 17x8 +45 all around and i'm looking for those 17x9 rears
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #10  
rnye's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,852
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

18 concave.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:18 PM.